In the ABA Journal: How to tackle gun violence without violating 2nd Amendment rights? Legal leaders share strategies. Let me fix that for you: “How to tackle gun violence by nibbling at the Second Amendment around the edges. Anti-gun leaders share strategies.” It shows how delusional the other side is:
The challenge of crafting a legal response to gun violence without violating Second Amendment rights was tackled by the next panel. Juliet Leftwich, legal director of the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, said that public revulsion over the 2012 Newtown, Conn., tragedy, in which a gun-wielding assailant killed 20 children and seven other adults, may have reversed a 30-year trend of weakening gun regulation.
Really? You passed new laws in a few states where you always had the power to burn us any time you generally wanted. The only real pickup was Colorado, and that started a backlash that would effectively kill the gun control movement post-Newtown. And even if the states friendly to gun control, they failed in New Jersey, and they failed in California. There’s such a thing as making lemonade from lemons, but there’s a fine line between that and outright delusions.
Chermerinsky noted that in general, courts tend to uphold laws regulating guns. “I can probably count on the fingers of one hand the number of decisions that have struck down gun regulations,†he said.
It’s not a numbers game. We can lose all decade long in the lower courts, but if we win key appellate cases, that has real impact. Illinois now issues concealed carry licenses, and the first are being mailed out as we speak. That was a direct result of the 7th Circuit ruling. California and Hawaii are inching ever closer to shall-issue due to a major win at in the 9th Circuit. Sure, we haven’t one in every circuit, but Illinois, California and Hawaii going shall-issue is what Joe Biden would call a “big f**king deal” and there’s honestly no other way you can spin that. The gun control people might win more cases, but we’re winning some very important ones.
UPDATE: I’d note that they held their conference at the National Constitution Center. I’ve reported on this organization before and their questionable stances on the Second Amendment. I won’t necessarily ding them for hosting an event, but since NRA has been known to do legal seminars in Philadelphia, I look forward to the National Constitution Center hosting one of those as well, just as a demonstration they are open to the view of the Second Amendment accepted by the Supreme Court.
“…the 2012 Newtown, Conn., tragedy, in which a gun-wielding assailant killed 20 children and seven other adults….” (emphasis added)
Better count again. The victim count was 20 children and six teachers/administrators … unless you’re also counting the “gun-wielding assailant” as one of the victims.
It wouldn’t be the first time the anti-rights side has artificially inflated their numbers.
The only way they could possibly count 7 adults is if they are counting that nutbag’s mom as the 7th victim…
The dean of my law school (Temple U) kept sending all of us students an electronic flier for this “expert” discussion, but I couldn’t stomach the list of speakers. I declined to attend since I figured I could deduce the tripe that would be spewed. Unfortunately, I see I was correct.
Any details on this
As an ABA member (and one with a leadership position – though not in this area) I would love to take them to task for poor reporting.
is anyone familiar with this? Usually, they just call it an AK47 or an Assault Weapon. But they are calling this a MAC-10 submachine gun. If its in fact not an automatic weapon, I’m going tyo have a field day.
Actually, just did a bit more digginh (and re-read the next line). Sebastian, can you change my previous comment with this one:
Any details on this
As an ABA member (and one with a leadership position – though not in this area) I would love to take them to task for poor reporting.
According to Wikipedia, his parents “fled” Cuba but his father continued to maintain some contact and was assassinated by gunman at some point as a tool of Castro. I don’t doubt that if they were actual hitmen (perhaps baked by the US Government, the CIA, the KGB, etc) that they might have used a machine gun. But I doubt it was legal.
Well, here’s more
Here’s a <a href="http://www.miaminewtimes.com/2008-09-25/news/let-terrorist-eduardo-arocena-go/full/"more detailed description of the attack
So, his father was a Cuban exile, though one who actually maintained contact witht the Castro Regime. He was assassinated by a group that carried out a whole heck of a lot of other attacks beyond this. And, well, its pretty tough to see how gun control would have ever stopped Omega 7. Here is how Wikipedia describes them(admittedly, not the best resource, but we go with what we have. I’ll continue to look for more).
Basically, his father was assassinated at the height of the cold war by a group started by JFK following the Bay of Pigs and essentially trained by the CIA and other American Intelligene operatives to take down Castro. Since his father maintained some connection to Castro (and could understandably be considered a stooge/spy/traitor/tool of the Castro Regime – and therefore perhaps also a KGB guy) its not too tough to imagine that folks would want to take him down. Which they did.
And this shit head communist (is it fair to call the son of Castro’s henchman who is an elected Democrat member of the Philadelphia City government a communist) now wants to dance on his fathers grave to advance his own political career.
Like hell. Someone needs to go call him out.