Internet Purification

From Insty, we hear that the Chinese government wants to “purify” the Internet.

But he made it clear that the Communist Party was looking to ensure it keeps control of China’s Internet users, often more interested in salacious pictures, bloodthirsty games and political scandal than Marxist lessons.The party had to “strengthen administration and development of our country’s Internet culture”, Hu told the meeting on Tuesday, according to the official Xinhua news agency.

“Maintain the initiative in opinion on the Internet and raise the level of guidance online,” he said. “We must promote civilized running and use of the Internet and purify the Internet environment.”

Hey, Hu Jintao, you can purify thishttp://www.pagunblog.com/blogpics/finger.jpgyou commie rat. No word yet on whether they’ll get any help in this department from Microsoft, Yahoo, Cisco, or Google.

Being Full of Crap Is Dangerous

According to Clifford M. Herman, over at the Seattle Post Intelligencer, bowing down to the NRA is dangerous. Let’s take a look at what he has to say:

The arguments favoring the private ownership of handguns in this country are based on two myths.The first myth is that the Second Amendment to the Constitution guarantees private citizens the right to own handguns.

The fact is this. The Second Amendment, in its entirety, states “A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The National Rifle Association has succeeded brilliantly and cynically in convincing the public that the amendment consists only of the part that follows the comma.

You should check your facts, because most of the recent scholarship out on the second amendment has rejected this model and embraced an individual rights view. Even liberal scholars, such as Larry Tribe have embraced an individual rights model of the Second Amendment.

The second myth is that every private citizen needs a handgun to protect his loved ones and property against intrusion by burglars. This is a pernicious untruth. As a longtime trauma surgeon at Harborview Medical Center, the main center for treatment of all kinds of wounds and injuries, I cannot recall a single patient who had been shot by the resident of a private home while attempting to burglarize it. I believe my surgical colleagues would agree with that assessment. It is far more likely that a young boy finds a loaded handgun in his parents’ bedside table and either he or a playmate gets shot while playing with it.

This would be news to Dr. Gary Kleck, criminologist at Florida State University, who’s studies estimate about two and a half million defensive gun uses annually, the vast majority of which do not result in anyone being shot. Most criminals break off the attack when confronted with someone prepared and willing to defend themselves. The truth is there are many of these types of defensive uses around the country every day, if you had ever bothered to look.

Those are the two myths responsible for the ubiquitous presence and use of handguns in Seattle and elsewhere in this country. They attest to the ignorance of our citizens and our laziness in not even reading and learning the history of the Second Amendment to our Constitution.

I’m sorry sir, but it is you who are the lazy and ignorant one, not us. It’s not exactly a good way to persuade folks by claiming that of people who simply don’t agree with you. Honestly, it makes you look like an arrogant prick. Handguns are ubiquitous and present in our country because Americans, whether you accept it or not, have a constitutional right to keep and bear arms to defend themselves and their families. Read what the founders have to say about the subject, and you’ll understand why you are wrong. People aren’t ignorant just because they choose to make the wise decision not to rely on the police, who can’t always be everywhere when some criminal chooses us as his mark.

The obvious truth is that only police and other law-enforcement officials should be allowed to have handguns in this country. Private citizens have no legitimate use or need for them, and they should be barred from possessing them. Period

So do you want to pay to have the police follow me around everywhere? No? Then don’t be so arrogant as to presume to make choices for me when it comes to my own personal security. Stick to medicine doc. Leave the gun subject to the people who actually know what the hell they are talking about.

How’s This for Home Defense?

This is a pretty interesting shotgun.  I didn’t realize if you pistolized a shotgun if qualified as an AOW.  I think because it doesn’t have rifling in the barrel.  This could be good for someone who is in a small house or apartment with tight corners, where a full sized shotgun might be too cumbersome to wield.  Pay your $5 dollar AOW NFA tax, and one can be yours!

It’s a Proud Day!

I have attracted my first anti-gun person to the site! OK, it’s not Sarah Brady, but it’s a start. Considering how seldom anti-gun people appear in our community, I have to admit a vague admiration for folks brave enough to dive in.

UPDATE: Ooops… looks like WordPress messed up the link.  I responded to the dude.  I try to be nice, since we’re trying to persuade.  I also figure having a few anti-gun types come in to my site might help drive the traffic numbers too ;)   I know gun blog readers love a good debate.  The traffic whore in me would love him to come back!

Disappointed

I was disappointed in Bush’s State of the Union speech.  Despite the fact that I’m totally on board with shooting more terrorists, a larger military, and giving Iran an ass kicking if needed, I just can’t get over the fact that he didn’t end it with a shout of “FREE WAYNE!” followed by whipping out a submachine gun and firing a burst at the ceiling.

The FDA is Getting too Cautious

I should say a little disclaimer here: I work in the pharmaceutical industry, but I was a libertarian type long before I did, so a lot of my opinions pre-date my involvement in the industry.  I will also say that not all the FDA regs are stupid and overly burdensome.  I think the government does have some roll to play in preventing drug companies from defrauding consumers.

Here’s one case I think they shouldn’t butt their noses into though:

The Food and Drug Administration will ask a panel of experts Tuesday and Wednesday whether it should require new contraceptive drugs to meet a standard of effectiveness before they are approved for the market.

No, this is not how to handle the problem.  The FDA should ensure that the drug companies claims for efficacy are true, and that the information is provided to consumers.  I think women are quite capable of weighing for themselves the efficacy vs. safety issue when deciding whether or not to take a particular contraceptive product.  We don’t need government experts doing that for them!

I’ve long believed the FDA should be about making sure consumers know how safe an effective a certain drug is, rather than making choices for people.  I’m totally OK with the FDA calling for more efficacy information being gathered on birth control, but don’t keep products off the market because a panel of government experts don’t think it’s efficacious enough.  Let consumers decide that.

Dumb Headline of the Day

Some clown breaks into Street’s Wikipedia page

Hey, Marcia Gelbart, you don’t “break into” anybody’s Wikipedia page.  Anyone can edit it.  That’s the whole idea.  You have to be careful when you read stuff on Wikipedia.  People do like to post crap like this there, and there are a lot of untruths, misrepresentations, and outright lies printed on it.   You know, come to think of it, I guess it’s not that different than reading The Inquirer in that respect.

The Continuing Saga of the Philadelphia Mayoral Race

Still a lot of crap, but perhaps some softening rhetoric coming from some of the mayoral candidates.  From Dwight Evans:

Evans, who has focused on crime for much of his 25 years in Harrisburg, began his campaign with a vow to woo former Police Commissioner John F. Timoney back from Miami to run the department again, if he was elected mayor.

I think Timoney was an effective police chief, and I think voters in the city think so as well.  I’m less confident that Evans can really woo him back.

Fattah softening the rhetoric a bit maybe?

“It is not illegal guns, it is the absence of opportunity which is at the heart of” Philadelphia’s crime problems, Fattah said when presenting his crime package this month. Nonetheless, Fattah’s plan, too, calls for more police to target guns, and includes the suggestion that high-tech cameras be used to scrutinize just who might be carrying a weapon in public.

Emphasis mine.  I agree with Fattah on what he said, but I still am not down with the cameras looking for “illegal guns”.  If he had ever carried a gun in pubic, he’d know how stupid this idea is.  There’s a reason they call it a “concealed” weapon.  The lack of opportunity is a direct result of a high wage tax which is killing the city.  The wage tax keeps businesses and people out of the city.

Businessman Tom Knox and U.S. Rep. Bob Brady, who has yet to declare his candidacy, have not yet unveiled large-scale crime plans. But they have grappled with the issue: Brady convened a high-profile summit on crime this summer, while Knox spent money on a petition drive urging new state gun laws.

When those candidates roll out policy platforms, strategists say, it is likely that they will have to strike the same balance between soft and tough approaches while striving for a unique way to discuss the issue.

Hey, I have a unique way to discuss the issue.  How about we talk about locking up criminals and getting them off the streets?

More from Congressman Fattah:

Where Nutter regularly excoriates Street over rising crime, Fattah avoids criticism of city leaders, noting that many cities struggle with crime. Instead, he used his announcement to tout continuing non-police efforts, such as a gun-buyback program he sponsors, and even praised programs championed by his opponents.

Hey Chaka, keep up the gun buybacks, because  have a lot of crap in my safe I’d be happy to take your money to get rid of.  Do a 200 dollar buyback, and I have some scary shit I might be willing to part with that you can hold up in front of the camera, and tell the folks how great you are for getting my scary looking, non-functioning POS off the street.  Just keep in mind if there’s any press hanging about, I’ll be sure to tell them I plan to use the funds to buy a brand new Kalashnikov if they bother to ask.  It’s a fair deal though.  You get good PR with the city folks, and I get a new rifle.