E-Mail Evidence

From David Olofson, we have the e-mail that ATF claims proves he purchased M16 parts.  I see a lot of talk about M16 magazines, which are identical to AR-15 magazines, and talk about a bolt, which are also identical, AFAIK.  But I only see one mention of M16 parts, and I would agree that in the realm of “proof” this isn’t it.

Related posts (automatically generated):

  1. Brownell’s
  2. Taking The Magazine Ban Seriously
  3. Magazine Change

4 thoughts on “E-Mail Evidence”

  2. The bolt carrier is different. The actual bolt is the part that fits inside the carrier, which as far as I know is the same for the M16 and AR-15. Though, a lot of people confuse the bolt with the bolt carrier.

  3. Pingback: SayUncle » More on the Olofson Case

  4. Hmmm. Don’t really see anything there about M16 fire control parts. Bolts and bolt carriers are specificly legal.

Comments are closed.