9th Circuit Rejects Machine Gun Rights

Professor Volokh has a case in the 9th Circuit:

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, holding that the Second Amendment protects a limited individual right to possess a firearm — unconnected with service in a militia — does not alter our conclusion. Under Heller, individuals still do not have the right to possess machineguns or short-barreled rifles, as Gilbert did, and convicted felons, such as Gilbert, do not have the right to possess any firearms….

Sorry to disappoint those who were hoping for the federal courts to embrace the right to own a machine gun.

Quote of the Day

For all you ladies out there:

Dude, it is what it is. The only women I’ve ever met who were remotely interested in shooting guns for fun were trashy – and even then, they’d agree to go along, but it would never be their first choice of things to do (never mind making guns their passion).

White trash girls are probably the only ones who wouldn’t have seizure-style eye-rolling fits if they saw a guy with a holstered gun sitting in the food court at the mall.

I really need to stop linking to these folks. I really do. But its a great study in narrow mindedness, and people unwilling to look beyond their own prejudices and stereotypes.  This is the open minded and tolerant progressive left.  I don’t know how people can have such disdain for their fellow citizens, and turn around and believe they are enlightened.  Where I come from, it just makes you an asshole.

Civic Disengagement, Part I

Robert Putnam received a hail of criticism when he released his book Bowling Alone.  Some of it, in my opinion, is justified, but there is a grain of truth in there somewhere.  I do not think that there’s been any great decline in America’s social capital.  The type of community we have here online is a great example of how social networking can change to adapt to changing technology. It’s perhaps a testament to my generation that I don’t know my next door neighbors nearly as well as I know many of you.  But I tend to agree with Putnam that our civil society is in trouble. One major criticism I would make of Generation X and Y, is that we’re probably the most civically disengaged generation in American history.

I don’t think that’s because we’re selfish, spend too much time on the Internet, or play too many video games.  New technology has been distracting people for a long time.  No doubt thousands of years ago, tribe elders expressed concern that Og was more interesting in spending all his time painting up the cave by this newfangled fire, and wasn’t showing any interest in participating the fish cleaning committee.  Putnam was quick to blame technology for the problem, but I don’t think it’s that at all.

When it comes to civic engagement, what has failed our generation is not technology, but government.  High taxes have ensured that people have less free time to spend on civic activity.  Big government has fostered a culture of “let the professionals take care of it” that strongly discourages citizen involvement and participation.  Our public schools, colleges, and universities no longer teach civics and government, and are more interested in turning out people who can fill jobs than they are turning out people who can think, and who can participate in civil society.  We care about issues, we have energy, but because of the lack of understanding of how civil society functions, it gets send in random and unproductive directions much of the time.

I don’t think this was an accident.  Those in positions of power benefit greatly from a passive citizenry.  Politicians like Barack Obama want to force the schools to make us civically engage, and tax us even more.  This is only going to make the problem worse, not better.  Politicians like Obama recognize the problem, but will never accept their philosophy on government is the problem.  The solution is always more government.  It’s always more guys like him either telling people what to do, or even more damaging, taking care of people so they don’t have to take care of themselves.  You will never hear the Barack Obamas of the world talk about tapping the resources and ingenuity of the American people, getting the federal government the hell off their backs, and let people self-organize and self-govern in order to solve problems.  It always has to be experts. It always has to be bureaucrats.  To suggest otherwise would be to suggest that we don’t need them, and their egos and ambitions won’t allow for that.

In Part II, I’ll talk about how I think this kind of civic disengagement is affecting the gun rights movement.

Police Protection in the UK

If you need the police in the United Kingdom, the police will get to you, maybe, in three hours if it’s really important, but three days if it’s not.  But not to fear, they say they won’t automatically prosecute people who defend themselves now.  It kind of makes you wonder if someone in Jolly England breaks into your home and attacks you, if it wouldn’t be better to just shoot the bastard, and bury him in the back yard.  I mean, it seems you’d have plenty of time before the police showed up.

Arming Police Officers Not an OSHA Matter

OSHA washes its hands of a claim by Princeton University Police officers that the University’s policy prohibiting them from carrying guns is a workplace hazard.  But of course, OSHA seems to think keeping guns out of the workplace is their business.

Police officers should be allowed to carry a gun to protect themselves throughout the course of their duties, and also off duty.  Even on a college campus like Princeton, it can be dangerous work.  Princeton isn’t far from a certain city that’s infested with crime, and college kids are easy targets, especially rich ones.  Their cops should be armed.  The fact that this is even an issue should say how out of touch academics have gotten from ordinary people.  Princeton University should be ashamed.  OSHA should be ashamed too, and We The People should put an end to this unconstitutional monstrosity of a federal agency.

DC Shenanigans

As was to be expected, the District of Columbia has passed a new set of gun laws which basically ignore the vast majority of the Heller decision, while throwing a minor bone to the courts.  Chris Cox, NRA-ILA’s Chief Lobbyist calls it “a joke.” The trigger lock provisions, which the Supreme Court explicitly threw out, are the most offensive.

But there is a bill in Congress to resolve this issue.  Eleanor Norton doesn’t think too highly of it:

However, Norton, who does not comment on District bills out of respect for Home Rule to set an example for other members of Congress, sharply criticized a pending congressional D.C. gun bill, H.R. 1399, Congressman Mark E. Souder (R-RI) introduced last week.

Souder’s bill is, “proof that some members either don’t have enough to do or know no bounds to their capacity for disrespect for democracy in the nation’s capital,” Norton said. She continued, “Republicans tried to overturn the city’s gun bans on four different occasions and failed, even when they were in the majority.  It’s not surprising that Congressman Souder, who was a frequent sponsor of anti-Home Rule bills, would continue to try to overturn the city’s gun laws.

Well, for one, Mark Souder represents Indiana, not Rhode Island.  Norton and her staff are so incompetent, they don’t even know the states her colleagues are from apparently.  Secondly, Congress has plenary authority over the District of Colombia.  It’s in the constitution, you can look it up.  There is no appeal to Home Rule for DC.  The DC City Council serves at the pleasure of Congress.  End of story.

For those who have time, here’s the resolution introduced in Congress which would set and then preempt the firearms laws for D.C.  It essentially imposes federal gun laws, and not much more.  No registraton, no bans of semi-automatic firearms, no lawsuit provisions, and no trigger lock provisions, and no ammunition restrictions, other than those imposed by existing federal laws.  The only differences is that firearms covered by the NFA will still be prohibited in The Distrct, and it does not address the issue of carrying firearms outside the home.  This is a good start, however, and we can fix the carry issue later.  If D.C. City Council shows itself to be petulant on this important constitutional matter, I think it’s entirely appropriate for Congress to exercise its authority over The District, and preempt them from regulating firearms.  Be sure to contact your Congress Critter, and tell them to vote for this important piece of legislation.

That’s a Lot of Names

The Terrorists Watch List has hit 1,000,000 names.  Who’s on it?  How do you end up getting on there?  How do you get yourself off there if there’s a mistake?  We don’t know! Well we know at least one person on the list, and Ted Kennedy.

That’s the beauty of it for the gun control groups, and power hungry authoritarians like Senator Frank Lautenburg.  By making it illegal to sell a gun to anyone who is on this mystery list, we can take away the constitutional rights we don’t approve of, with no due process.  I thought only Bush was the one mugging our civil rights over the war on terror?