I’m glad Ilya Somin has clarified that he’s sympathetic to the idea that voters do have a moral duty to be informed, even if they are, as he has suggested, rationally ignorant of politics. I think voters do have some obligation to be informed, but my bar is not set very high. When I think about a voter’s moral obligations, I have to take into account the fact that I don’t believe the the single issue voter is shirking his civil responsibilities.
If someone is, for instance, well informed on the gun issue, and vote specifically on that issue, I have no issue with their going to the polls and casting a ballot. But how far is someone obligated to be informed on their single issue? I tend to take the position “trust, but verify.” Don’t just vote a certain way because your buddy told you candidate X would take all your guns. Do some research. See if other people are saying that too. Check with organizations who advocate on behalf of your issue and see what they say.
I think there’s little problem with general political ignorance provided that the voter is reasonably informed on the issues that bring him or her into the voting booth. They don’t have to be experts, but they should be well enough informed and engaged as to make up their own mind.
I view my job as an activist for this issue to be making sure gun owners have the right information and are asking the right questions. I won’t hide McCain’s record on guns, but nor will I exaggerate it. I’ve heard way too many other activists claiming there’s no difference between McCain and Obama, which just isn’t true.