Coalition By The Numbers

There’s been a lot of talk in the comments about how Republicans need to do this or that so that their political outlook will match up perfectly with whatever pet issues the commenter finds appealing.  This is no way to build a coalition.  The question at hand is what the Republican coalition looks like now, and how to build it back to a majority coalition.  Right now, the Republican Party is a coalition of:

  1. Religious and value voters
  2. Nationalist conservatives, or national greatness conservatives
  3. Sportsmen
  4. Fiscal conservatives who want smaller government.

Each of these categories is, itself, contain a bunch of subcoalitions.  But these are the basic categories I’ll enumerate for this exercise.  Jettison one, you no longer have a majority.  Bush essentially lost the coalition by catering heavily to 1 and 2, throwing a few bones to 3, and doing his level best to pretend 4 isn’t that important.  Bush basically cut taxes, and then told 4 to take a hike.  The other problem is that 4 are often not keen on 1’s social agenda, and many have migrated to the Democraic Party, no real bastion for 4s issues, but when 4 sees no difference between the parties, they will vote on social issues.  This is how Republicans have lost the Northeast and the coastal West.

But here’s the rub: the folks in 1 vote, in huge numbers.  Their turnout machine is unparalleled.  Mike Huckabee was a long shot, but with basically only the religious vote, he managed to take several southern states in the primaries.  John McCain is a solid 2, and for those that think paleoconservatism is the path to the future, McCain won the nomination with pretty much only the 2 vote, and enough 3 and 4 who are still left, because Romeny didn’t really inspire.  You don’t win elections without 1 and 2.  So to quote SayUncle: It’s time to put on our big boy pants, and come up with a platform that keeps the coalition together.

The religious voters in the Republican party need to understand that they live in a secular country, and that younger voters aren’t as religious as their parents.  Those are just the breaks.  You can’t legislate your way out of that.  Amending constitutions isn’t going to fix it.  But by the same token, the 2s, 3s, and 4s of the coalition need to accept some value issues in the Republican platform in order to get the religious vote to turn out and work for the coalition.  If the 4s want to build a coalition without 1s, they have to create a turnout machine that surpasses that of the religious vote.  Unfortunately, that requires more work than most 4s are willing to put in.

Once you get involved in electoral politics, it becomes readily apparently why libertarians have no seat at the table: they don’t bring anything to it.  That’s what has to change if they want a bigger voice.

Involvement

David and I might disagree on a lot tactics wise, but he’s absolutely right about this:

We expect politicians to champion our rights, but how many of us make it worth their while to do so on such a hot button issue–one that is radioactive in most urban locales? Yes, true, a principled person does not shrink from hoisting his colors, but most politicians, even the ones who vote our way the majority of the time, view it as but one of many issues. And even though we don’t like to hear this, most constituents do not consider gun rights their major concern.

If that’s to change, we can’t elect someone to do it for us. Representative government doesn’t mean we abdicate our own initiative and go back to sleep.

He’s absolutely right, and gun owners don’t do nearly enough to help out politicians that support them.  It’s going to be very rare to get true believers in politics, but we do have some.  We even have some in my district here in Bucks County.  Yet I would have been happy to have even a dozen dedicated volunteers.

How the Second Amendment Fared

Dave Kopel reports it’s not a disaster, and makes this note about the presidency:

President. Based on past record, certainly a -1. One important difference between our last Democratic President and our next one is the latter has shown himself to be much more self-disciplined. Accordingly, it is possible that he will not waste his political capital on a reckless culture war against gun owners, as President Clinton foolishly did.

So perhaps President Obama will spend his political capital elsewhere, and be a -0.1 President on the gun issue. The approach would be in line with the positive, unifying themes that Obama presented on victory night in Iowa last January, and with his eloquent victory speech tonight.

I don’t know if President Obama will be so temperate. But anyone who fears for the worst can still hope for the best.

We must hope for the best, but prepare for the worst.  2010 will be important for us.

Barack’s Insurance Policy

Steven Den Beste has an excellent, and serious post about this election.  But I love his update:

One other good thing: no one will be spinning grand conspiracy theories about this administration’s Vice President being an evil, conniving genius who is the true power behind the throne.

Joe Biden is Obama’s insurance policy.  He’s better protection for him than a whole legion of Secret Service agents.

Quote of the Day

From tgirsch:

Anyway, it’s not the end of the world, and this too shall pass. You’ll get over it. And if you wait long enough, the Democrats will screw themselves, as parties in power always do, and it will once again be your turn to fuck everything up royally.

Very true.

The Brady Spin

The Brady Campaign is already spinning this election as a victory for “sensible gun laws.” ‘Fraid not Brady Campaign.  Number one issue cited by Sportsmen this election was the economy.  Guns were not even an issue this election.  At all.  That didn’t help us.  In the end, Barack Obama’s tactic of running as far away from gun control as possible was a winning strategy for suppressing the gun vote.

Barack Obama is my President

I can’t agree more with this message from Bob Krumm and Rightwingprof.  Obama won.  He will be legitimately our President.  The margins were high enough in most of the states that mattered, I don’t think we can attribute it to fraud.  We can attribute it to Republicans sucking.  I am willing to give Obama the chance to govern as the center-left moderate he’s sold himself as.  I am willing to give him a chance to show me he’s not going to come after gun owners.  And I am absolutely willing to start talking about the 2010 elections.  We have an election to win, folks, and we only have two years to get ready.

How NRA Fared in District 8

Unfortunately, we lost our presidential and congressional race this election.  It was a bad day to be a Republican, and people overhwelmingly said the economy was their top concern.  But, both our endorsed State Representatives comfortably held on to their seat, and we did oust one anti-gun Democrat in my distrct (Chris King).  We also got a B rated state rep elected over a question mark candidate.  Interestingly enough, I don’t think Obama’s coattails reached down to state level races.  We did pretty well at the state level, overall, at least in my district.

The Silver Lining: Frank Farry Wins!

My State Representative, Chris King, who’s grade dropped from an A- to a C-, was ousted by Frank Farry.   Frank’s NRA grade was “?” because he didn’t get his questionare in, so I could send him no volunteers.  But I did talk to him, and got a reassurance he was a good guy on our issue.  This is a win for gun owners.  It’s also a win for class.  Seriously, how much of a goober are you if you don’t show up to thank your supporters and congratulate your opponent?  I think it’s safe to say Chris King’s political career is finished.  Frank Farry ran a stellar campaign, and to oust an incumbent as a Republican in a Democratic election year is a testament to that.  I hope we’ll be able to work with Frank moving forward, and that he’ll earn an NRA endorsement for 2010.