H-S Precision Booth at SHOT

According to someone who attended, their booth was not barren at this year’s SHOT.  It’s unclear how much we have actually hurt H-S Precision.  I am going to hold out hope they’ve seen a significant drop in business, regardless of their booth traffic at SHOT.  But this does offer a lesson in overextending political capital.

It seems we had some effect on Cooper Firearms, but it’s not entirely clear that wasn’t related to pre-existing business trouble.  H-S Precision made the gamble that our bark was worse than our bite, and if they do not suffer a significant reduction in business as the result of our refusal to buy their products, we will have a significantly reduced likelihood of twisting anyone’s arm and making them cry “Uncle!” in the future.  This is exactly how it works on Capitol Hill too.

We’re on Facebook

You can now follow this blog on Facebook.  I was reluctant to bring the blog onto Facebook, since I have coworkers and other folks I’m friends with there who do not know of my efforts here, but Facebook doesn’t seem to make a strong association.  If someone looks, they can find it, but they have to look.  I think I’m OK with that.

But now that you know who I am on Facebook, feel free to friend me.

Montana Gun Rights Bill

The bill Joe highlights here in the Montana Legislature would run into problems with the Supremacy Clause, but it shows how states can take measures to resist federal encroachments on fundamental rights.  If the state of Montana were very serious about such a measure, to the point where it would be willing to arrest federal agents sent to enforce unconstitutional gun laws, things would get interesting.  I’ve discussed this in more detail here, about how state governments resisting laws they find intolerable can up the ante, so to speak, and serve to draw a line in the sand that is an alternative to what others advocate.  States like Montana, Wyoming and Idaho already seemed primed for such action, even if under the current circumstances, these bill are merely symbolic.

Sad Story About a Gun Accident

This woman’s son was killed in a gun accident, and she’s become an advocate for safety training:

She’s convinced that gun-safety courses, especially for teenagers, can avert tragedies such as the one that forever changed two families.

The foundation is circulating an online petition — about 440 people have signed — asking for mandatory safety training. Stein plans to send the petition to Barack Obama.

”People who don’t have bad intent should at least be taught how to handle guns,” Stein said. “You don’t let [teens] behind the wheel without knowing how to drive . . . This is not about taking people’s rights; it’s about keeping people safe.”

Morris Stein bought a gun after graduating from Dr. Michael Krop Senior High School. It was a choice more whimsical than ominous: an antique French rifle.

”I’m allowed to have a long gun,” he told his mother. “I’m an American citizen . . . No one knows where the clip is but me.”

Mandating gun safety training in high schools is a proposal I would gladly stand by Robin Stein and advocate.  I think everyone should know how to safely handle a firearm, including not pointing it in unsafe directions, or keeping firearms gratuitously loaded and unsecured.  But I won’t get behind any proposal to make training a prior restraint on purchasing a firearm.

Religion in the wrong hands can be quite deadly, yet we do not require training in peaceable religion before purchasing Bibles, Torahs or Korans.  We do not require people first read The Gulag Archipelago before purchasing a copy of The Communist Manifesto, or the Diary of Anne Frank before buying Mein Kampf.  I agree that we need more education on firearms, but that education cannot be a barrier to the exercise of a constitutional right.

Last Day of Bush

Today will be the last day we’ll be saying “President Bush”, and it’s been a long eight years.  While I am not happy with the result of the election of 2008, in a lot of ways, I’m happy to put George W. Bush behind us.  Not having voted for him in 2000 (or Al Gore for that matter), I was never his biggest fan.  But I always supported him on the decision to invade Iraq, and I still support it.  The future success of Iraq and the Arab world will be the yard stick by which his administration’s success is measured.

For a coalition that deserves a lot of credit for getting him elected twice, Bush never treated the gun rights community with the respect I think we deserved.  Nonetheless, I think the state of gun rights over the eight years of Bush is one of continued improvement.  Bush came into office arguing for renewing the Assault Weapons Ban.   It never happened.  We passed or expanded right-to-carry in several states.  We got the National Park rule on concealed carry changed (for how long remains to be seen).  We ended the continual threat of lawsuits that threatened to bankrupt gun makers.  We got Heller, despite Bush’s Solicitor General’s best effort to scuttle it.  And despite noise on our side that Heller is worthless, it’s already toppled more gun bans in the few months that it’s been in effect than we could ever have hoped to accomplish legislatively in a decades long campaign.

While Bush was no great friend to gun rights, nor was he a great enemy.  By not using the bully pulpit to beat the drum for greater gun control, he allowed us to make some cultural progress on the topic of guns.  Both 9/11 and Katrina probably helped facilitate that a great deal.  But I don’t think it can be denied that it’s far better to have a half-hearted friend in the White House than an avowed enemy.

It remains to be seen yet how much political capital Barack Obama is going to be willing to gamble on the topic of guns.  Clinton gambled a great deal on it over his entire presidency.  I’m both comforted and terrified that Barack Obama seems a good deal politically smarter than Clinton.  Comforted that he probably understands he would burn signficant political capital fighting a contentious culture war issue, but terrified because in his heart he is an avowed enemy of civilian gun ownership.  Bill Clinton, when it came to gun control, was a backgammon player.  Obama will be a chess player.  The latter has the potential to be more dangerous played over the long run.

Two Virginia Gun Bills

Two Virginia gun bills will be given a hearing tomorrow in subcommittee.  One of the bills will allow people with concealed carry licenses to carry into restaurants.  Hopefully this will pass this time around.  The relevant section in the bill is below.  Additions are in italics, while the struck out sections are being removed:

J3. No person shall carry who carries a concealed handgun onto the premises of any restaurant or club as defined in § 4.1-100 for which a license to sell and serve alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption has been granted by the Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board under Title 4.1 of the Code of Virginia ; however, nothing herein may consume an alcoholic beverage while on the premises. A person who carries a concealed handgun onto the premises of such a restaurant or club shall inform a designated employee of the restaurant or club that he is carrying a concealed handgun. A person who carries a concealed handgun onto the premises of such a restaurant or club and consumes alcoholic beverages is guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor. A person who becomes intoxicated while carrying a concealed handgun on the premises of such a restaurant or club is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. However, nothing in this subsection shall prohibit any sworn apply to a federal, state, or local law-enforcement officer from carrying a concealed handgun on the premises of such restaurant or club or any owner or event sponsor or his employees from carrying a concealed handgun while on duty at such restaurant or club if such person has a concealed handgun permit while actually engaged in the performance of his official duties.

It seems like an eminently reasonable bill, though I would prefer it not have the requirement to inform the restaurant of the fact that I am carrying.  If you’re going to require this, I might as well just open carry, which is already legal.