Month: January 2009

Mike Sullivan has resigned as director of ATF. I will be the first to admit when I am wrong. I originally said that the Bush administration would end with Mike Sullivan in charge of ATF, despite any opposition to his confirmation. It’s a week to go until Bush is out, so pretty clearly my prediction was off.

UPDATE: Turns out the resignation isn’t effective until January 20, so I guess I was right after all.

Apparently God wants us to harass businesses which sell a lawful product.  Interesting that one of the “Clergy” in the pictures looks an awful lot like Bryan Miller.  I didn’t even know Bryan was ordained!

Colosimo acknowledged that a significant number of handguns sold at his shop have been discovered to have been used in crimes. However, he said, that is because of the shop’s large sales volume for decades.

“We sell 100 times more than some other stores,” he said, adding that the shop has had contracts with “at least 250” Pennsylvania and New Jersey police departments during the last six decades, including Philadelphia’s.

He said he believed it was unfair to deny guns to prospective buyers simply because their previous purchases had been used in crimes.

“Suppose you came in here 10 years ago and bought five guns,” he said. “And you lose one of them, or it’s stolen, and five years later it’s used in a robbery. Does that mean I shouldn’t sell it to you?”

Miller said that retailers who signed the pledge still could “use discretion” in such situations.

Good for Colosimo’s for standing up to this crap.  Any local gun shops who agree to not sell guns to people who have had guns stolen from them will not get my business, and I will do everything I can to make sure everyone knows why.

If anyone buys for a minute that Miller wouldn’t sue or smear any shop that used this “discretion” he speaks of, then they are nuts.

Apparently no judge in Indiana is willing to rule that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act actually means something.

We have at least one gun control bill introduced in Congress.  Thanks to Jdude for bringing this to my attention.  Introduced by Congressman Rush, called HR45.  It is a bill that mandates licensing, registration and safe storage for handguns and semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines.  It also provides for inspection, so you surrender your fourth amendment rights by being licensed.  It also requires reporting of Lost and Stolen firearms, and you must inform the federal government if you change addresses.

Normally, I’d tell everyone not to worry too much, because it’s probably not going anywhere, but we can’t take anything for granted in this Congress.  Right now the bill has no co-sponsors, and has not been scheduled for a committee hearing, so it is no threat right now.  But we should keep an eye on it.  There is also the risk that Rush gets pieces of his bill attached as amendments to other bills on the House floor.  The problem with this Congress is, if the Democrats were to decide that HR45 is the hill they want to charge up, we’re going to be hard pressed to stop them from taking it.  In my last post I mentioned that NRA prefers not to take high risk gambles it doesn’t have to.  If this bill goes anywhere they will have to gamble on stopping this one.   But the hope is the Democrats know it’s a high risk gamble too, and will also be wary of taking it.  My interpretation is that this isn’t good ground for the Democrats to fight us on, so they aren’t likely to.  But it’s a card on the table, and we have to be mindful of that.