NRA Board of Directors Endorsements

At the beginning of the week, I mentioned we’d be issuing our board endorsements soon, in addition to talking about the NRA board composition, and how candidates are nominated.  We wanted to do this yesterday, but mother nature had other ideas.

Bitter and I are happy to endorse the following candidates for election or re-election to the Board of Directors for the National Rifle Association.  There are plenty of other candidates who are worthy out there, and you get 25 votes, but we felt we needed to narrow the field for our endorsements.  We’d ask the blogging and blog reading community to vote for our six candidates.

  • Scott Bach
    When most gun owners have given up on New Jersey, Scott has stayed to fight. He defends gun owners regardless of their interest – .50 caliber bans, bear hunters, collectors who want the freedom to buy more than one gun a month, and many more.

    Scott is the President of the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs, the state organization leading the fight for gun rights in the Garden State. He’s an attorney who has used his skills and network to defend both the First & Second Amendment. When a public school was caught sending home anti-gun literature, he sued to mandate that pro-gun literature be honored in the same way.  When NY/NJ Port Authority police locked up a Utah man for lawfully traveling with firearms, Bach put the resources of ANJRPC to work to sue the officials who unlawfully arrested him in violation of federal protections.  Through ANJRPC, Scott also works with competitive shooters and manages a large shooting range. Their member clubs have trained Olympic shooters. He is also a member of state groups in seven other states, actively supporting their efforts with what he has learned from the political and cultural fights to preserve gun rights in New Jersey.

    On the new media front, Scott has been very active in reaching out to bloggers and launched his own blog on the Star-Ledger’s website to counter the anti-gun Bryan Miller.  He did an interview for the Blog Bash site last year to discuss his thoughts on how new media can be leveraged to advance Second Amendment rights and develop the shooting sports.  He notes that the ANJRPC range may have been the first in the country to offer its members free wifi in the clubhouse.

    See Scott’s interview with Sebastian here.

  • Robert Brown
    Brown is the well-known publisher of Soldier of Fortune magazine. He has a distinguished military career, and is currently a very active member of the NRA Board. More importantly for purposes of this endorsement, he’s also a vocal advocate in the leadership for new media publishers.

    During the Second Amendment Blog Bash in Louisville, Brown joined The Outdoor Channel for a reception and brought along complimentary copies of the magazine for bloggers and readers alike. At the following board meeting in September, he used his position on the Legislative Policy Committee to question ILA’s Chris Cox about their work with bloggers, encouraging them to work more closely with the group and applauding their efforts thus far. He was clear that this medium of reaching out to the most outspoken of the grassroots could be an important tool for the organization, a view we clearly support.

    In other interesting SOF/new media news, it appears that the magazine’s website is run using WordPress.

  • Edie Reynolds
    Our political debate on gun rights will no longer be relevant if there is no shooting culture. Competitive shooting and outreach programs will make sure that Americans maintain at least a basic understanding of firearms, and give them a glimpse of how fun responsible gun ownership can be.

    Reynolds is an outspoken advocate of competitive shooting and walks the walk as an active coach and recruiter to the sports. She has been a certified rifle instructor for more than 30 years and served as assistant rifle coach at North Carolina State University from 1974 to 2000, as well as a rifle counselor at a girls’ summer camp in Vermont. She also serves as the Youth Development Director of the Amateur Trap Association, and her focus on the board has been on programs designed to get women and young people involved in hunting and competitive shooting. Edie started shooting competitively in 1966 and is a five-time Women’s National Champion in Smallbore Prone and holds numerous other shooting titles.

    The work of folks like Edie cannot be taken for granted. Edie Reynolds deserves your vote for the Board of Directors.

    See Edie’s interview with Sebastian here.

  • Steve Hornady
    This is a rather unique endorsement in that we don’t have specific new media citations or close personal experience. What we do have is the opinion of other trusted leaders who have repeatedly noted that Steve Hornady has been known to ask very good questions, and not be a rubber stamp board member when issues need to be discussed. It shouldn’t be shocking since Hornady has been involved with the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers Institute, National Shooting Sports Foundation, Wildlife Management Institute, Hunting and Shooting Sports Heritage Foundation, and Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation leadership over the years. In the past, Hornady has served on the Publications Policies, Public Affairs and Membership Committees.

    Board members who ask intelligent and thoughtful questions, who aren’t afraid to challenge others for the good of the organization, are a valuable resource. And based on what we have heard about Steve’s experience, we believe he should remain on the board.

  • Joe DeBergalis
    Joe DeBergalis is a career law enforcement professional fighting for gun rights in New York as Vice-President of the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association. He’s also a competitive shooter in pistol, rifle, and shotgun sports, as well as a certified instructor.

    DeBergalis has put his background to good use by serving on the Education & Training Committee and Law Enforcement Assistance Committee of the Board. He’s no slacker politically, either. He’s the Election Volunteer Coordinator for 8 New York Congressional Districts and the District of Columbia. In addition to his political work for the NRA, he’s bridging gaps in the community by serving as a member of the Government Affairs Committee of Safari Club International while also being an active AR15.com participant.

    While his website lists dozens of memberships, it’s worth noting his work in New York, and not just because it’s a challenging state. Other pro-gun leaders in the state have heaped praise on Joe for his efforts there, and I suspect that gun owners in his home state will see him around for years to come.

  • Ronnie Barrett
    Barrett’s activism and rifles are known far and wide, so he is not likely in need of an endorsement to turn out votes. However, he’s worth highlighting on the ballot for several reasons. First, his strong positions against further gun control should be rewarded. Even when he could continue to make money serving law enforcement officials who buy enjoy his products, but try to ban them from civilian ownership, he very publicly refuses them. He has called on the industry to follow his lead, and it would be nice if others would.

    Second, his outspoken nature may prove useful for the NRA Board of Directors. He’s a bit of a renegade in the industry, and hopefully he could bring that to a board in need of a little infusion of energy every once in a while. It would appear that he would not necessarily accept the status quo at face value, which, when tempered with more senior members of the board with more institutional experience, can be a healthy mix.

    Oh yeah, and he’s a time traveler.

Crossbow Hunting

One issue happening, probably below the radar for most gun blogs, is the controversy going on right now in Pennsylvania over crossbow hunting.  Many bow hunters are angry at NRA for their support of crossbow hunting in Pennsylvania, which was recently approved by the Game Commission over the objections of United Bow Hunters of Pennsylvania.

I question whether this was an issue NRA should have been involved in, but I think more from a “is it worth the trouble” perspective, rather than because I agree with the bow hunters.   Hunting is in decline.  By many measures, this decline is serious, and is only going to get worse as more hunters die off, or get too old to go afield.  Opportunities for hunting are dwindling.  Anything that opens up more opportunities to get more people into the sport is ultimately beneficial to both the hunting and shooting communities.

The Humane Society of the United States will relentlessly dog hunters until they ban hunting in this country, one species at a time.  They’ve already had success ending dove hunting in Michigan, and we all know about the bear hunts in New Jersey.  They were also instrumental in the California lead ammunition ban, and are supporting a nationwide ban on lead ammunition.  These people are good at what they do, and they are organized and well funded.  In a lot of ways, they make the Brady Campaign look like pikers in comparison.

If hunters want to commit slow motion political suicide by supporting policies that restrict access to their sport, and ultimately reduce their numbers, and their political power right along with it, I’m not sure NRA really ought to stop them.  Perhaps it’s not worth the grief.  But both hunters and shooters will suffer if hunting disappears in North America.  Hunters should get behind anything that expands opportunties for hunting.  Bow hunters are being dangerously short sighted on the crossbow issue.

Sporting Purposes Restrictions Afoot?

Apparently Representative Engel is under the belief that enforcement of the “sporting purposes” provisions of the Gun Control Act of 1968 have been unenforced for the history of the Bush Administration:

In recent years, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has quietly abandoned enforcement of the import ban (which was authorized by provisions in the 1968 Gun Control Act and enforced by Presidents George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton). As a result, the civilian firearms market is flooded with imported, inexpensive military-style assault weapons, primarily from former Eastern bloc countries including Romania, Bulgaria and the former Yugoslavia. Importers are also able to skirt the restrictions by bringing in assault weapons parts and reassembling them with a small number of US-made parts. Assault weapon “parts kits” for assembly by individuals are also being imported. ATF has further weakened the prohibition by placing certain extremely problematic assault rifles on the “curios or relics” list, making certain firearms automatically eligible for importation.

So what is he proposing?  No importation of gun parts?  Those guns are assembled in the United States.  I also think he misunderstands that this isn’t an enforcement issue, they are enforcing what’s in the United States Code, and Code of Federal Regulations.  Here’s the relevant law, Title 18, section 922(r) of the United States Code:

It shall be unlawful for any person to assemble from imported parts any semiautomatic rifle or any shotgun which is identical to any rifle or shotgun prohibited from importation under section 925 (d)(3) of this chapter as not being particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes except that this subsection shall not apply to—

(1) the assembly of any such rifle or shotgun for sale or distribution by a licensed manufacturer to the United States or any department or agency thereof or to any State or any department, agency, or political subdivision thereof; or

(2) the assembly of any such rifle or shotgun for the purposes of testing or experimentation authorized by the Attorney General.

Right now, the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR 27 478.39) allows up to ten imported parts to be used in the manufacture of firearms that are otherwise prohibited from importation.  How is Congressman Engle proposing this be handled?  The fortunate thing is, it will require a change in the federal regulations to implement his wishes, which is subject to the rulemaking process.

Obama can certainly undertake rulemaking here, but he’ll risk the wrath of gun owners in 2010 if he does so.  This will not be something he can do sneaky, behind the scenes.  It’s also not a matter of ATF just enforcing the law, like the Congressman seems to think.

Import/Export of Arms Concerns

There are rumblings out of Canada that the first attempts at a low-key administrative attack on guns is beginning.  Jim Sheperd reports in this morning’s Shooting Wire:

A report making the rounds in Canada that says officials have it on “good authority” that our State Department may be on the verge of cutting off all imports of certain calibers of ammunition.

Ammos listed for this rumored ban include the .50BMG, 7.62x39mm Soviet, 7.62x51mm NATO, .308 Winchester, 5.56 NATO and .223 Remington. Additionally, we’re hearing that an expansion of this proposed ban might be broadened to include the 6.8mm SPC, 9mm Parabellum, .40 S&W, and .45 ACP- among others.

In other words, State Department officials may be floating a trial balloon to see if there are howls of protest, or whimpers of compliance. …

Additionally, Canadian officials tell me they are hearing rumblings of blanket export bans on certain firearms to Canada and the attachment of DSP-83 End Use Certificates (with their $250 Export Fee) attached to all other types of American firearms.

I would question whether there is the authority to regulate importation/exportation of ammunition and assess fees on firearm exports, but I haven’t read all the relevant federal statutes and regulations.

AR-15 .22LR Upper Bleg

So with spring coming, our club hosts CMP matches.  Any rifle capable of rapid fire will do.  I plan to get out with the AR-15 and shoot a few this year, and I think I’ll keep shooting the Langhorne Rod and Gun practical matches, since they are on the last Saturday, and don’t conflict with much else.

I’ve found Thursday indoor silhouette at the club keeps me getting on the range at least once a week, but typically I bring Bitter’s CZ 452, or my Kimber Government Model 82.  I’m thinking it might be of good benefit to be able to practice offhand shooting with an AR-15 on Thursday nights at indoor silhouette, but this would mean I’d need a .22LR upper for the AR, and the special magazines for that caliber.  I know they make such things, but I’m curious if anyone among my readers has any experience with them, and can tell me which manufacturers of .22LR uppers and magazines for the AR-15 are making quality products.

What a Craptacular Day

Well, any day when one of your trees falls on your neighbor’s house has got to be pretty bad.  Sorry for the lack of posts today, as I was in meetings all day, while simultaneously trying to give Bitter instructions on what to do about the tree.

Seems that a tree falling in a wind storm is considered an Act of God, and the only way you’re liable for it is if someone can prove negligence, like the tree was clearly troubled, and you refused to do anything about it.   I had my trees trimmed just last year, because I was concerned about dumping branches on my neighbors.

So because it’s an Act of God, my neighbors are actually responsible for filing their own claim with their homeowners for damage to their house.  Fortunately, there was very little damage to their house.  I think they will have to replace a few roof shingles, and maybe some of the capping on the garage.  The removal of the tree is going to be on me, and I’m going to tend to the damage to their fence which divides our property.

I’ll be honest though, I feel horrible that one of my trees fell on their house.  No guilt a good stiff drink can’t deal with though.  Tonight is a bourbon night, maybe two.  Indoor Silhouette was earlier tonight.  Did pretty well on rifle: a 39.  But tonight was special.  For Valentine’s Day, we taped up some heart shape lollipops to shoot at.  If you hit a lollipop, it was worth 5 animals, but you had to sacrifice an animal for every attempt at the lolly.  I hit one, so it boosted my score, but I probably would have had a 36 without it, since I was hitting the animals pretty well compared to usual.  Shooting with pistol was not as good.  A few months ago, 23 would have been good, but I’ve been getting into the high 20s more often lately, so 23 is back down to where I was at the beginning of the season.  I’m still surprised by how easy it is to psychologically defeat yourself.  Started out with hitting 8 pigs.  Keep that up, it’s a 32, which is decent for me.  Bombed turkeys, big time, only 3.  Got 6 of each of the remaining two animals.  If you worry about missing, it seems you’ll miss.  I do better when I’m just enjoying being on the range.  I do worse when I worry about how I’m doing.

Busy

I’m in meetings most of today, and I spent last night and this morning preparing for them.  I would ask Bitter to fill in for me with some content we found yesterday and this morning, but she’s busy dealing with the tree that the wind from last night’s storm brought down on to our neighbor’s garage.

Look for more later.

UPDATE from Bitter: Yeah, this is getting fun.  The wind keeps whipping up to some pretty high speeds, so I’m not confident that things won’t get worse.  Which kinda sucks since right now, the damage looks to be minimal (a fence is leaning).

Pics from my phone since it seems my camera is in Sebastian’s laptop bag which is with him at work.  Hopefully he’s had time to see them by now.

Some of the photos are taken through the screen and windows since it’s not exactly safe to go out there.  The tree split and one half went on to the neighbor’s garage about 10 minutes after I called the tree guy to come get it out.  We’re still trying to figure out what to do.

The Influence Hierarchy

Countertop was kind enough to give us a rank ordered list of types of people important to politicians:

Based on my considerable experience in this area, here’s how – generally speaking – a candidate will prioritize the interests of stakeholders – all in the name of winning elections and diminishing the effort they need to undertake to win.

  1. Ability to organize and deliver large numbers of constituents
  2. Ability to organize large numbers of campaign volunteers
  3. Ability to raise money from large numbers of donors
  4. Constituent who donated money and worked on campaign
  5. Constituent who donated money
  6. Constituent who worked on campaign
  7. Non-constituent who worked on campaign
  8. Non-constituent who donated money
  9. Constituent who is known to member and is a member of same party
  10. Constituent who is member of same party
  11. Constituent who actually votes (and voted for member)
  12. Constituent who actually votes
  13. Constituent

As you can see, a little effort and organization on our side can have a huge impact on Gillibrand.

If even 1/10th of the gun owners in New York donated 25 dollars, and called to tell her to vote against a new gun control law, she’d be hard pressed not to listen.  That would be serious money she’d be putting at risk by going against you, and her natural inclination as a politician seems to be pro-gun.

There are limits to this, of course, you’re not going to turn Chuck Schumer pro-gun no matter how much you donate, because he’s a true believer, and he can make up that money elsewhere.  But Kirsten Gillibrand has a record, and it’s good.  Those pooh poohing her because she’s not good enough, or because she frames gun rights in the language of hunting are forgetting that a) this is New York we’re talking about, and she has to win a Dem primary in two years and b) it’s sometimes necessary to take a gamble on someone new and promising in order to build influence early.  If you support her, either through donations, organizing or volunteering, and she screws you over, you can always withdraw that support, and make sure she knows why.  This is a prime opportunity for gun owners, but will enough capitalize on it in a smart way?

Obama Seems to Forget Quickly

It has apparently been lost on President Obama that Nevada may have gone blue for him, but it is not consistently a blue state.  Perhaps he forgot that fact right before he tried to trash the state’s tourism industry.

Sin City’s mayor wants President Barack Obama to apologize for saying companies shouldn’t visit Las Vegas on the taxpayer’s dime.

Oscar Goodman spoke after a regular scheduled meeting with tourism officials where he expressed concern that federal lawmakers might be discouraging travel to the city.

Don’t say that offhand remarks can’t have consequences:

Late Monday, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said it had moved a three-day conference from the Las Vegas Strip to San Francisco amid what the bank called a broad review of its activities. Goldman Sachs has accepted $10 billion in federal bailout funds.

Vegas is one of the cheapest cities that companies could travel to when they need to cut event costs.  Instead, now choosing meeting cities is a matter of politics instead of smart money management.  (Consider where Goldman Sachs moved their meeting to after the remarks.)

What I’ve Been Doing in My Spare Time

The local rifle and pistol club that I belong to was looking for some new ideas for their web site.  Since I have a bit of experience with operating web sites, I volunteered to have a stab at it.  Tonight, this is what I’ll be presenting to our board.  Hopefully they’ll like it.  It’s served off WordPress, same as this blog.

More rifle and pistol clubs need a healthy web presence.  There’s plenty of crap out there about people misusing guns, so it’s worthwhile to have live examples of people having fun and using them responsibly.  I’m hoping WordPress is going to be easier for match directors and club leaders to update, so our web site will give the impression of an active, fun shooting club.