Despite some confusion because of the misleading term “assault weapon,” I think this newspaper is starting to get it:
There are too many weapons in the hands of criminals and others who have no business with them. That is a problem not easily solved and gun control laws don’t work to do that. Even regulating a type of gun won’t solve that.
Strict enforcement of existing gun laws and citizen activism to report and crack down on illegal guns and gun-related crimes are needed. Punishment for crimes using guns needs to be more severe.
In this case, these people need to be found and be prosecuted criminally and civilly. Such acts rise above negligence.
I noticed the typical immune response to the word “assault weapon” being used in the comments, but I thought the paper deserved from praise for being willing to make a more serious look at the issue then just a reflexive call for more guns laws.
That was my thought when I read this investigative piece in at philly.com. What is Philly always clamoring for more gun laws when they can’t convict the few suspects that do appear in court.
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/front_page/20091213_Justice__Delayed__Dismissed__Denied.html?viewAll=y
This type of accident, with supposedly “stray bullets,” is common in urban areas. There are a lot of things that could be done to help prevent it but until that becomes the “will of the people,” nothing is going to happen. Let the bullets reign.