New York Times Weighs in on Lead Ammo Ban

Of course they think it’s a disgrace that the EPA can’t ban lead ammunition, because why can’t we have a back door way to end the shooting sports and hunting as we know it? That would mean Heller and McDonald are without consequence, and we won’t be dismantling New York City’s gun laws in short order. It think that’s what the Times is really afraid of.

Related posts (automatically generated):

  1. New York Times: Shills for the Gun Lobby
  2. New York Times Not Happy
  3. New York Times and Due Process

2 thoughts on “New York Times Weighs in on Lead Ammo Ban”

  1. Pingback: New York Times Weighs in on Lead Ammo Ban | Snowflakes in Hell

Comments are closed.