Every Monday, Joe Huffman highlights examples appearing in the media of people violating Markley’s Law. What is Markley’s law?
That has to be some kind of variant of Godwin’s Law: As an online discussion of gun owners’ rights grows longer, the probability of an ad hominem attack involving penis size approaches 1.
This week’s example is pretty egregious. I’m wondering how Mr. Auslander thinks this is going to work for Bitter.
I’m surprised you would need to ask that question.
I haven’t had that conversation with Bitter but some women prefer their men to be “well trimmed”.
:-)
I think Sebastian means more of how his “proposal” would work for me as a gun owner since I’m missing the relevant “part” that Auslander believes is required for handgun ownership. I guess he would force me to go to a certain type of store to buy a fake one, but those are already hairless. Not to mention, it still wouldn’t change the fact that I keep guns in the home. Nor would it change the fact that I drive an SUV, something I’m sure he would also say is a sign of having a small penis, even though I don’t have one at all.
I knew what he meant. It was just my attempt at humor by deliberately misunderstanding what he said.
I got the humor. Usually I’m the one to miss it :)
Sounds like one of the gun control nuts would like to be known as “Perfect Outlander.” Like that what’s-his-face pimple of an anti-gun blogger would like to be “Wodanaz son of Wodenaz.” Which shows he knows nothing of the Aes or of Norse mythos.
But when someone tries the “hair” line, always remember, real he men keep it worn off.
Stranger