Arlen Specter Runs on the Past

Apparently, Arlen Specter’s vision for the future of Pennsylvania includes lots of unemployed union guys drawing government checks and no modern skills. At least, that’s what you gather from his first commercial.

The company Specter highlights went into bankruptcy nearly a decade ago. It was dissolved shortly thereafter. According to Wikipedia, the company operated with substantial losses from 1982 on, with a one year exception in 1988. Their high point was in the 1950s.

Perhaps Specter wants to make Bethlehem Steel a symbol of his career. It’s high point was decades ago, and he’s been operating as the Senator everyone on both sides of the aisle loves to hate. Only this year, we have a better choice to replace him. So, Senator Specter, you can join those men in your commercial in the unemployment line come January. Although, with a little luck and some serious action by the GOP, hopefully we can turn things around to the point where the four of you can find some job training in a new field and you won’t be out of work for long.

Memo to Hollywood: Recruit from Texas More

According to a tidbit found by Wyatt, actress Amber Heard – originally from Austin – is a big fan of guns.

I’m a good shot and I love guns – I own several. I don’t have children in the house, so I sleep with my gun in a place that’s close enough that if I needed to protect myself, I could. It’s not in bed with me, though; it’s in a safe location. I’m fully trained and I’m an active member of a gun club. I’m definitely pro-gun.

You may not have heard of Heard, but those of you who love zombie flicks may remember her as 406.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKgObejVRb8[/youtube]

Does it Matter if the GOP Doesn’t have a Frontrunner?

I keep seeing all of these headlines about the lack of a clear frontrunner for the 2012 GOP nomination. But every time I read one, I roll my eyes and wonder why it even matters. Consider the timeline for the Democratic & Republican primaries in advance of the 2008 election.

April 17, 2006 – Former Senator Mike Gravel announces his candidacy for President. Given that he was unable to reach even half a percent in any state where he was on the ballot, it’s clear he was never a really a frontrunner.

Gravel was the only candidate at the point where we are now in the race for 2012. The earliest any serious candidate would consider declaring would be after 2010 elections. Even then, I would say that they should hold off until early 2011. You’ll see why I suggest that based on history.

November 7, 2006 – Midterm elections that give the House to the Democrats.

November 13, 2006 – Rudy Guiliani announces his exploratory committee. Though he made another announcement that he would run for the office in February, we knew in November that he was a serious candidate.

Some might classify Rudy as a frontrunner, but I don’t think so based on actual results. He bombed in Iowa and New Hampshire, and he couldn’t even deliver in Florida where he put all of his campaign hopes.

November 30, 2006 – After Democratic gains, then-Governor Tom Visack announces his candidacy for the office. He would drop out less than 3 months later.

So even when the pundits start chattering about GOP frontrunners the morning after the election in November, ignore them. Remember that we will still be more than a year out from the earliest of the caucuses. And that the last time around, not even the freakin’ Governor of Iowa was able to compete.

December 4, 2006 – Sam Brownback announces an exploratory committee & makes his run official the next day. He wouldn’t make it to the first caucus.

December 12, 2006 – The Elf announced shortly and couldn’t even draw more than 2% of the vote in any contest.

December 28, 2006 – Leave it to the adulterer cheating on his cancer-stricken wife who filmed himself screwing his mistress while she was pregnant with the child he would later disown to ruin your holidays with political announcements.

Now, you could argue that because John Edwards did finish second in Iowa and third the next four contests, he was a frontrunner. But, given that he announced during the holidays and just days before 2007, he’s the exception to the rule.

January 3, 2007 – Mitt Romney announces an exploratory committee. His formal kick off would come just over a month later.

January 7, 2007 – The Biden announces his candidacy without insulting anyone. However, that would not remain the case on the campaign trail. And when it comes to frontrunner status, he does maintain the honor of becoming our national embarrassment. His campaign would end in less than a year.

January 10, 2007 – Jim Gilmore creates an exploratory committee, though he will hold off to formally launch a campaign until April. He would end the campaign in July.

January 11, 2007 – Chris Dodd launches the campaign that he will end in less than a year. Ron Paul also announces his exploratory committee, though his kickoff wouldn’t take place until March. I think it can be safely said that regardless of what the internet polls said, Paul was never a frontrunner.

January 14, 2007 – Duncan Hunter announces an exploratory committee.

January 20, 2007 – Hillary enters the race. Considering she would lead a campaign that was so successful it damn near split the party, I’d say she was a frontrunner.

January 21, 2007 – My birthday! And the day that Bill Richardson announced. He would drop out after New Hampshire.

January 28, 2007 – Mike Huckabee announces his run for president. I personally would not consider him a frontrunner. However, he did win some states, so I’ll go ahead and include him.

February 10, 2007 – Barack Obama enters the race. Considering he won, I guess he gets default frontrunner status, too.

February 28, 2007 – John McCain enters the race. Considering he was the only other candidate on the November 2008 ballot, I guess we’ll consider him a frontrunner, too.

April 1, 2007 – No, I’m not joking. Tommy Thompson announced a presidential run on April Fool’s Day. I guess only fools thought he would make it to the first primary contests.

April 2, 2007 – At least Tom Tancredo thought better about his announcement date than Thompson.

June 1, 2007 – Fred Thompson begins his months-long tease with the formation of an exploratory committee.

September 14, 2007 – Alan Keyes begins his run for the top seat – again. He would ultimately run campaigns to secure the nominations of 3 parties, 2 of which voted no.

While I know the press isn’t looking for actual announcements right now, this is just a reminder that we’re still 9 months out from any serious news about the 2012 campaign. There can be no frontrunner for the nomination if there are no candidates. A scandal could erupt that would send any of the popular names you see today into political oblivion. If that happens, they will never file for an exploratory committee or announce a run. Of course, it might not even take a scandal. Considering that Mitt was the architect of the health care reform that is crippling Massachusetts, the change in focus on issues now makes him a huge liability for the GOP. They can’t run on a real repeal/reform message with him at the helm. However, just a year ago, he had a great background in business and financial experience to lead the discussion on bailouts and a recovering economy.

The point is that we honestly have no idea. Don’t get discouraged or frustrated, or even feel like you should have a favorite for 2012 picked out in early 2010. Based on past results, we probably won’t even have a good idea of potential options until the very end of this year. There’s no need to rush it.

Engaging Political Candidates from the Comfort of the Couch

Because there isn’t EXCEPTIONALLY MAJOR OMG-HIT THE PANIC BUTTON gun news hitting every single day in Pennsylvania, I will often post about general political engagement opportunities that are non-gunnie specific on PAGunRights.com. Obviously, most people are not single issue voters. But even when they are, there’s no reason we shouldn’t be engaged with politicians in the same way as other citizens. This last week, it just happened that three “filler” stories just happened to line up to create the perfect example of how gun owners can stand out with lawmakers from the comfort of their couches.

First, I posted the social media homes of all of the candidates. I follow all of them, and I suggest that anyone who wants to stay up-to-date on what the candidates are doing should do the same – at least until the primary election weeds it down to two candidates. (For example, Sen. Tony Williams was saying he could find a way to respect the Second Amendment while trying to get illegal guns off the street. That’s great except that his proposal involves making our carry permits worthless…) On Twitter, you can sometimes even get them to respond when you argue back or cheer them on.

Then, I found out that NUGUN managed to engage his local lawmaker on Castle Doctrine and get him on the record through an online townhall that he found out about via new media. Questions for the townhall were submitted in advance and via email during the event. How wonderfully convenient to do that before the big rally in Harrisburg this month! It now means that NUGUN doesn’t really need to spend much time in Rep. DePasquale’s office other than to introduce himself & thank him for his support. He can now spend more time on other things during the rally.

Finally, the Morning Call‘s John Micek announced a series of live lunchtime chats with all six gubernatorial candidates over the next couple of weeks. If you’ve got a computer and internet access near lunchtime on Monday, you can tune in to ask Rep. Sam Rohrer questions. On Wednesday, you can do the same for Attorney General Tom Corbett. If you decide to ask any gun- or hunting-related questions, let us know either in the comments or via Twitter @PAGunRights or @bitterb. Actually, even if you plan to tune in to ask non-gun questions, feel free to chime in through the comments. I’d be curious to find out if any readers are going to step up their political engagement on any issue with this opportunity.

(On a completely personal note, I probably will tune in, but I doubt I’ll ask anything. I’m pretty up-to-date on most of the issues because I follow this stuff so closely. For my personal preferences, I’ll probably vote for Rohrer in May as a protest vote, volunteer for Corbett between May and November, and cheer for Jack Wagner on the Democratic side in May. The latter is because he’s by far the least problematic for gun owners. He has given a squishy answer on a gun ban question before, but it was squishy enough that he could probably be convinced to change his mind and would not be likely to make it a priority if he managed to win. The other Democratic candidates were all solidly in the “end preemption” and basically tear down anything pro-gun about Pennsylvania category.)

On “Caution” in Supporting Democrats

I’ve responded in general terms to critics who say I should be “cautious” supporting Pennsylvania Democrats who are pro-gun. But since there’s a pile on from red states that implies I’m only looking out for gun rights at the expense of other limited government issues by supporting Democrats, I’m going dive into specifics and ask that said critics respond with the best way to handle each of these races.

First, I do think it’s important to note that this criticism comes from red states. Why? Because Pennsylvania isn’t one. Now, on the other hand, it isn’t Massachusetts, either. In that state, if you can find a more moderate Democrat, it’s important to support them in most districts simply because only a Democrat can get to the negotiating table to beat back gun control in the first place. Realizing that Pennsylvania is far more politically diverse, we have a luxury at looking at political decisions by district. And that’s what any good political analysis will do – consider the realities of the district and the actual candidates on the ballot.

Senate District 22
This seat is an open race due to the retirement of A+ rated Sen. Bob Mellow.

The Candidates
Here are your choices of candidates: Joseph Corcoran (D), Charles Volpe (D), Jim Wansacz (D), John Blake (D), Chris Doherty (D), Christopher Phillips (D), Frank Scavo (R). We’re supporting Rep. Wansacz as our featured candidate because he is an A rated candidate. In fact, he’s actually become even more pro-gun since he was initially elected. Meanwhile, Volpe has never held elected office before, Corcoran is a former county commissioner for the major county in the district, Phillips is a school director for the district’s largest city, Blake is a former bureaucrat, and Doherty is mayor of the largest city in the District. None of these candidates have a background that would give them a rating or voting history. However, we do have video of Doherty going on the record to end preemption and limit how many guns we could buy, something that could only be effectively instituted by creating a formal registry of gun owners. On the GOP side, Scavo is a former school director in one of the smaller towns of the district. He did previously run for this seat in 2002 and received a grade of A-, a hair lower than one of the Democratic candidates running now.

The Voting History
As the local paper put it when the Senator’s retirement was announced, this seat was never competitive. They said, “the only speculation was whether the Republican Party would make it a contested race.” In other words, the local GOP doesn’t even make an effort for this seat. Looking at the electoral history, it makes sense. Wikipedia has information dating back to the 1960s when the seat was held by a Democrat from 1963-1968. It was then held by a Republican for less than two years (not a full Senate term, not even a full House term!) from January 1969 to November 1970. Since 1971, it has been held by the same Democrat.

The Summary of Facts
So here’s what we know: There’s a competitive Democratic primary that has one good guy and one bad guy with four unknowns. Gun owners have the opportunity to sway to primary so that the pro-gun guy can win. There is no primary on the GOP side, so no one needs to worry about him until after the May primary. The last time the GOP put up a candidate, it was the same guy and he pulled in a whopping 31% of the vote – beat by more than two to one.

The Risks
If gun owners are crazy and flippant about politics like me, they have the chance to get involved in the Democratic primary and set it up so that they have a choice between candidates rated A and A-. If they are cautious and sit out of the game because it’s the evil Democratic primary, they are likely looking at a choice in the fall of F and A- with a strong likelihood that the F will win. And, like that, they will have just flipped an A+ seat into F overnight.

The Questions
So, critics, do you still encourage caution in this race? If you would sit out as a gun owner, why? What about the electoral makeup of this district or quality of the candidates would bring you to a different conclusion?

I have more examples below the fold that I would like our critics to analyze as well. Just indulge me in the game of politics. If you’re a critic of getting into bed with Democrats, I think it’s important to see a few different examples of when I would encourage people to get involved and when I think they should sit it out.
Continue reading “On “Caution” in Supporting Democrats”

Very, Very Blue Districts can Still be Pro-Gun

You know, there’s one nice thing about living in Pennsylvania. We have seats that have been Democratic for not only my lifetime, but the entire life of my mother as well. Yet, amazingly, pro-gun candidates can still win. It’s so nice when gun rights really can be bipartisan.

So with that, I started a fundraising page on the bluest of the blue sites for solidly pro-gun Democrats – using their tools to advance our cause. For now, I’ve posted one candidate because he has the earliest and most competitive race coming up of those who are currently on the service.

I can’t tell you how much I’m in love with ActBlue’s capabilities for fundraising & promoting candidates. The right has nothing remotely close to this since SlateCard never went anywhere, and more importantly, can’t fundraise for state candidates.

Anyway, I thought of the issue again because a new report shows that in 2007-2008, state legislative candidates had to raise more than $1 billion for the first time. I’m only going to feature state pro-gun Democrats who need help on the site, so you don’t have to worry about other issues like ObamaCare and bailouts. It’s not even a factor in these races. I’m also going to focus on those who need help because they are being challenged by anti-gunners at this point.

So, if you’re really supportive of keeping actual pro-gun lawmakers in office and willing to step over the partisan divide, consider giving a few bucks. The guy up there now is being challenged by another Democrat who wants the government to control how many guns you buy and make your concealed carry license worthless. And if this isn’t a step across the partisan divide for you, then yay! Open your wallet to show your support for the pro-gun guys and send a message to those who are running on a gun ban platform in your party.

If I have volunteer researchers, I’d also be happy to set up a national page that features pro-gun Democratic campaigns from around the country. If that interests you, just email me bitter -at- pagunblog.com.

FBI Impersonating Conservative Groups

So the FBI has now admitted they are falsely representing themselves as fake leaders of real right-of-center organizations in order to chase leads on potential extremists who threaten violence against lawmakers. This is a pretty disgusting tactic because when the story is resolved and reported, the innocent groups are being smeared through association by law enforcement officials.

As the F.B.I. moved in on a man who allegedly threatened Senator Patty Murray, Democrat of Washington, because of her support for health care legislation, law enforcement agents faced a challenge: they needed to confirm that Charles A. Wilson, the man whose phone number was used to leave menacing messages on her office voicemail, was in fact the man who made the threats.

So they found a convenient way to get Mr. Wilson talking about the issue that seemed to be weighing so heavily on him. Special Agent Cory Cote of the F.B.I. called Mr. Wilson at his home number and, according to the criminal complaint, “disguised himself as a representative of Patients United Now, a group that was ostensibly attempting to have the federal health care reform legislation repealed.”

Mr. Wilson apparently was interested in what the group had to say: the call lasted about 14 minutes, according to the complaint.

Patients United Now is a real organization, part of the Americans for Prosperity Foundation, a conservative, antitax advocacy group, that has actively opposed the legislation and also runs a project called “Hands Off My Health Care.”

According to the report, the suspect had no connection with AFPF prior to the FBI’s actions. AFPF’s leader points out that they have condemned those who make threats, and the organization’s activities have focused on getting grassroots mobilized. They do voter education seminars which are copy cats of the NRA grassroots seminars that educate people on how politics and elections work and how the individual can get involved.

I think there’s a damn good question here: Why is the FBI impersonating leaders of real organizations in their stings? What are they saying to suspects that will ultimately be (falsely) attributed to right-of-center leaders? They could destroy an organization’s reputation with their sting actions when the actual staff and volunteers had nothing to do with criminal activities. There’s no reason the FBI couldn’t make up a new fake organization rather than trying to drag the successful small government groups through the mud.

Where’s My Obama_____?

My mom is a social worker, and has been all of her life.  I swear, she’s probably one of the only libertarian-leaning social workers you can find.  She mentioned that as soon as the election results were in, her office started hearing from clients asking, “Where is my Obama money?”  They believed if they elected Obama, they would get free money from the government immediately – on top of whatever benefits they already receive through various social service programs.

Now it looks like insurance companies and doctors get to answer those fun questions.

Questions reflecting confusion have flooded insurance companies, doctors’ offices, human resources departments and business groups.

“They’re saying, ‘Where do we get the free Obama care, and how do I sign up for that?’ ” said Carrie McLean, a licensed agent for eHealthInsurance.com.

So what will happen when all of those people who showed up to vote for Democrats in 2008 get another knock from ACORN workers (or whatever they are called in your state now, in PA, it’s PCOC) saying that it’s time to go vote again? They didn’t get their free “Obama money” in 2008 or 2009. They don’t have their free “Obama care” in 2010. Hell, they still won’t have free “Obama care” in 2012. What will ACORN promise them this year?

Last year, there were two lines for the two precincts that vote at our polling place. The one representing all of the apartment complexes was hours long & overwhelmingly supporting Obama. Then there were the home owners in the other precinct. Sadly, there was a line of maybe 4 minutes & everyone in it was talking about voting for McCain. I’ll be happy if we can reverse the line trend this year and make sure everyone in ours is talking about defeating the Democratic leadership’s agenda.

Obama the Gun Salesman

We’ve all seen the jokes about how Obama is “salesman” of the year for most gun shops in the country. We’ve seen the consistent reports about high gun sales since mid-2008. We’ve felt our wallets grow lighter due to higher prices caused by this short supply. The ammo shelves, while not bare anymore, hasn’t exactly been flush in the last few years. Primers? Heh, good luck because reloading didn’t even save folks from the surge in demand.

But how is this for perspective: All of the top 10 months for NICs checks – save two – have been since it became obvious that Obama would win the election.

November 2008 1,529,635

  • Notable Event: Obama Election

December 2008 1,523,426

  • Notable Event: More of the nation realizing the new president’s buddies are former terrorists.

December 2009 1,407,155

  • Notable Event: It’s Christmas & Obama is still president.

March 2009 1,345,096

  • Notable Event: Eric Holder announces renewed push for gun bans.

March 2010 1,300,100

  • Notable Event: Pelosi announces she no longer expects to hold actual “votes” in Congress anymore.

February 2009 1,259,078

  • Notable Event: January’s paycheck went to pay off all of the holiday gift bills. Holiday gifts included many guns & stockings full of ammo, as shown by the 2nd highest NICS month.

December 2006 1,253,840

  • Notable Event: Democrats take back the House of Representatives & Nancy Pelosi is announced as Speaker-elect in the weeks after the election.

December 1999 1,253,354

  • Notable Event: I have absolutely no idea. The only thing I can figure out is that it was about this time that media attention was shifting to Al Gore’s candidacy and the start of the Democratic primaries. (I don’t remember December of 1999 too well. I was in college & I had mono that month. I drank until finals, crammed until I flew home, and then slept for the rest of the month.)

February 2010 1,243,211

  • Notable Event: Obama is still president, and he really starts to twist the arms on health care. Many to start to wonder what is next on his agenda.

October 2009 1,233,982

  • Notable Event: Obama is still president.

Thanks to NSSF for this data.  I love random facts.  If any of you can think of other notable events in these months (or in the few days before the month) that might have influenced sales, feel free to add them in the comments.