I did not realize that blogs were the new scapegoat for every rumor in the gun industry, but apparently that is our new role. Today’s Outdoor Wire reports that blogs were a source of crazy rumors about Daniel Defense on Friday and throughout the weekend. I turned to Sebastian and asked if he had even heard of Daniel Defense, muchless remembered reading anything about them this weekend because I certainly did not. He did not.
The first thing I need to handle is rumor control. I know the blogosphere was rolling Friday and through the weekend with the story of the demise – or impending demise- of Daniel Defense. The company that’s been known for very nicely done AR-15 accessory rails and other parts had jumped into the hot complete-AR rifle market with both feet, adding a barrel-machine and other capital investments to allow them to market their own, branded Daniel Defense rifles. …
As a company official told Rich, the rumors of their demise is “complete BS.”
I checked Uncle’s site – nothing. I checked the go-to blog for industry news, The Firearm Blog – nothing. So if Uncle didn’t hear about it as one of the largest linky-love gun blogs, and if Steve who focuses specifically on the industry-related news didn’t hear about it, who in the blogosphere was spreading this rumor? It’s research time.
A Google blog search shows exactly one result for any news about Daniel Defense’s bad fortunes. I found one forum hit. One. And it was not a blog, it was a forum. That forum hit also did not say that Daniel Defense was going out of business, merely reporting that they furloughed employees, which is exactly the story that Jim confirmed in today’s Outdoor Wire. When I searched the general web for any other potential blog hits Google may have missed, I don’t see any such rumors in many pages of search results.
This is the second time in a month that Jim has used the blogosphere as a scapegoat for the rumor mill when I could find no evidence to back up the claims. If any readers find evidence that the blogosphere was responsible for spreading rumors about the demise of Daniel Defense this weekend, please share it, and I will make the correction. In the meantime, I find the claims dubious. One forum hit that merely discusses the fact that Daniel Defense really did furlough their workers does not justify the wording in TOW’s story to lay the blame on blogs.
UDPATE: Uncle just found weekend hit number two – again, a forum. And once again, as I read through it, it’s all about the confirmed information from the CEO of Daniel Defense who did an interview with the local paper. Still looking for that big bad blog rumor…