They Caught Him

The guy that shot the armored car driver last week is in custody.  Quick work on the part of the PPD.   This is disappointing though:

Ali was scheduled to be arraigned later Saturday. He was arrested on an unrelated charge Friday afternoon and was later charged with two counts of murder, robbery, a firearms charge and other charges after giving a statement.

So this guy had an outstanding warrant.

Ali previously served seven years in federal prison for bank robbery, the detective said. It was not clear if he had an attorney.

This guy shouldn’t have been roaming the streets.  Will the Philly courts do the right thing this time?   I hope so.

Dangerous Men

I wanted to blog this earlier, but Wyatt beat me to it.  It takes a certain kind of cold hearted son of a bitch to decide the lives of people doing their jobs is worth less than the money they are transporting.

If any good can come out of this, it’s that people who choose to be gunmen, and go about armed, need to be serious about their skills, and be prepared to do what they have to do.  There’s always the possibility of a bad guy getting the drop on you, but I hope others will be on alert, and the next confrontation will result in dead scumbags.

Tacoma Mall Shooter Convicted

From Seattle Times:

Superior Court jurors Tuesday convicted Maldonado of 15 separate criminal counts, including attempted second-degree murder, assault and kidnapping, in the shooting that wounded seven people at the mall around noon on Nov. 20, 2005.

In doing so, jurors weren’t swayed by the defense’s claims that a mental disorder shielded Maldonado, 22, from responsibility for the shootings.

Dan McKown, a Tacoma man who was paralyzed in the shooting and now uses a wheelchair, said it was clear to him Maldonado was intent on gunning down numerous people as he walked through the mall spraying bullets.

Good to hear he didn’t get off light.  Read the whole thing.

Gun Control in Australia

This is an interesting editorial talking about the surge in crime in Australia.  I link this for this quote, which you think would explain why measures taken failed to work:

Sydney University gun control researcher Professor Philip Alpers said: “Firearms are the most desirable objects in the criminal world and they (criminals) will go to great lengths to get them.”

You don’t say?  I wish my job were that easy.

Hi-Point Pistol of Choice in NYC

Ahab has a pretty good bit on how the City of New York is claiming that the High-Point C9 is the weapon of choice for the street urchins.  This doesn’t really surprise me.  I actually own one Hi-Point product; their 9mm carbine.  It’s actually not a bad shooter.  Quality on the parts isn’t too hot, but the design is simple, and surprisingly reliable.

Apparently they go on the street for about $250 bucks, which is a bit higher than the price on the legal market.   There’s going to be some risk premium charged by traffickers to make the possibility of multiple felony counts worth their while.

Grey Whale Shot With a .50

Apparently some Makah tribes people are in jail for killing a gray whale with a .50 caliber rifle. Earlier reports are that it was a machine gun, but that turned out to be untrue:

The Makah Tribal Council was meeting behind closed doors at the tribal headquarters in Neah Bay, on the remote northwestern tip of Washington’s Olympic Peninsula, The Peninsula Daily News reported.

Gorman, the Fisheries Services spokesman, said the tribe did not authorize the hunt.

“It came as much of a surprise to the Makah Whaling Commission as it was to anyone else,” he said.

“Plenty of witnesses” saw what happened, Gorman said. Now it will be up to federal officials to decide whether and what charges to bring and whether they are civil or criminal, he said.

The whale was shot with a .50-caliber rifle, he said. Early news reports describing it as a machine gun were incorrect, Gorman said.

The Daily News also reported witnesses saying the whale was harpooned about 9:30 a.m. Saturday off the Seal and Sail rocks, two miles east of Neah Bay.

There are a lot of different types of 50 caliber rifles, and this report isn’t too specific. Shooting an animal as large as a whale with any small arm is highly unethical. I support the right of native tribes to hunt whales in the context of sound wildlife management practices, but I do hope this does turn out to be rouge tribe members, rather than standard practice. I’m happy it appears to be the former.

UPDATE: Alcibiades might have found something that highlights my ignorance on the topic:

Historically, a mussel shell tip was used, in conjunction with barbs from elk horns. In recent times, a steel “yankee style” head is used, but the yew wood shaft is still employed, due to its superior flexibility, water resistance, and strength. Held fast to the whale, the harpoon shaft comes loose, to be recovered later, and a line is thrown from the canoe with seal skin floats attached, to provide sufficient drag to weaken the whale. In the past, a series of smaller lances were used to repeatedly strike the whale, gradually weakening and killing it, often over a period of hours. Recently, this technique has been replaced with the use of a .50 caliber rifle (as mandated by the International Whaling Commission) which is used following the harpoon strike to ensure a more efficient kill. Once the whale has been killed, a crew member called the “diver” jumps into the water, and cuts a hole through the bottom and top of the whale’s jaw, to which a tow line and float are attached. This holds the whale’s mouth shut and prevents the carcass from filling with water and sinking.

Emphasis mine. It would seem to me that even a .50 caliber shot, even if it’s from a 50BMG, wouldn’t quite be enough to ensure a more efficient kill on an animal this size.

UPDATE: Kudos to Alcibiades for doing the research so I don’t have to:

The Tribe was interested in substituting the traditional killing lance for a large calbier rifle both to eliminate a prolonged pursuit and because the use of the killing lance would be considered inhumane by modern standards. The Tribe contracted a veterinarian with a background in ballistics and together investigated the performance of several high caliber firearms including the Winchester.458 Magnum, the Weatherby .460 Magnum, the .50BMG, and the .577 A-Square Tyrannosaur. The Tribe found that all of these weapons to be adequate, but the .50BMG and .577 A-Square Tyrannosaur to be the most potent combination. The .577 A-Square Tyrannosaur was selected for the 1999 hunt since it was a substantially lighter rifle (14 pounds versus 20 pounds for a .50BMG) and because it had a 3-round capacity (one cartridge in the chamber, two cartridges in the magazine) compared to the single-shot .50BMG caliber configurations which were tested.

Well, I guess that’s one sporting use of the .50BMG, but I can’t say I am convinced the rifle is powerful enough to take down such large prey humanely.  Even three bursts from the mighty .577 Tyrannosaur I wouldn’t bet on, except in the hands of a very expert marksman.

Robbery Foiled

From Deb, comes a report of a group of armed robbers is Ypsilanti, MI, who didn’t expect to find themselves staring down the business end of a shotgun.

The clerk told deputies he saw someone crouching in front of the counter and shouted as another man wearing a ski mask attempted to enter the store. Upon seeing the shotgun, the man by the entrance held the door open as the man by the counter crawled out, Egeler said.

Shot through the door was a bad move.  You don’t take shots at fleeing men.   But it’s good in this instance that no one got hurt, and the robbers didn’t walk away with their booty.

Biting the Hand that Feeds You

I’m intrigued by this post from Second City Cop, that talks about leaders of a community that are demanding police do something about violence, while having previously crapped all over them for…. doing something about violence.  I thought this quote from an otherwise good editorial Chicago-Sun times was also interesting, but a little off in terms of semantics:

During that same period, 1,253 persons were shot by random civilian gunfire. Of that number, 410 victims were 19 years old and under. The total number of fatal shootings in this age group was 44. Also, four teenagers were bludgeoned, four were stabbed, one was burned to death and four others were killed by an unknown weapon.

Is this gunfire really that random?  Or does it involve disputes among criminals?  The term civilian does, actually, have the term “civil” in it, and I’m relatively hesitant to apply the term “civilian” to thugs shooting it out with each other on the streets.  I’m generally not one to pick over semantics, especially when I agree with the points made in the editorial, but I think the more we write like this, the more we lose.

It’s great to see the media beginning to understand the problem; that neighborhoods need to stand up and cooperate with police to fight crime, but I will still encourage the media to carefully pick terms that do a better job of characterizing criminals, who are willful, and generally not all that random, in the type of crime they ply in their neighborhoods.