Fired for Doing the Right Thing

I’ve said before that corporate HR departments are more concerned about deflecting blame and not allowing the company to be sued than they are about doing the right thing.

Here’s a case of a Home Depot employee losing his job for doing exactly that:

Last week, the 24-year-old department manager confronted a man who was standing by a soda machine in front of the Murfreesboro store off Old Fort Parkway holding a crowbar and a wad of cash. When the suspect started running, Chester said his instincts took over.

He was fired Monday for violations of company policy in the incident.”When he ran, I ran after him,” he said. Chester caught the thief and restrained him in the parking lot until police arrived.

Chester was shocked to find out that for managers and most employees, catching and detaining thieves is against company policy.

Yep.  It’s against company policy, because the thief might get hurt and sue home depot.  The employee might get hurt, and sue home depot.  It could be a massive orgy of everyone suing everyone else!

Such things are nightmares to HR executives in large companies, and a few lost dollars is better than a lawsuit or bad publicity.

But even if he had known how the company wanted him to act, it wouldn’t have made a difference.

“He had a crowbar, and what if he had come inside and gone after customers or the employees working at the registers?” Chester asked. “I’d rather have him coming at me than going after any of the customers.”

Sounds like a good guy to me.  A pity he has to become another victim of corporate cowardice.  Making a “citizens arrest” is a minefield that people should be very wary of, and unlike a police officer, we don’t have qualified immunity.   But I hate to see someone who does it right, and helps get a loser off the streets, punished for his good deed.  As a society, we need to encourage bold behavior like this, not punish it.

Cleanup on Ailse 5

I really wouldn’t want to be the guy who has to clean this up:

At that point, a 58-year-old employee shot Mies once in head with a shotgun.

Generally, at close range, you can only can shoot someone once in the head with a shotgun, because after that, they will no longer have a head to shoot again.

Philadelphia Prison Overcrowding

Apparently Philadelphia’s prisons are filling up.   I have to wonder about this:

The increase in prison population comes at a time when the city has had a spike in fatal violence. Experts say, however, that the rising inmate count has more to do with a long-term crackdown on drug offenders in the city and tougher prison sentences.

Some small relief may be on the way. State legislation has been devised to reduce overcrowding across Pennsylvania, and part of the change could send at least 700 Philadelphia inmates to state facilities.

Well, at least the state is pitching in to keep non-violent drug offenders off the street, you know.  It’s not like the city has a problem with violent offenders or anything.

The Goldkamp report also pointed out that 88 percent of inmates serving sentences were nonviolent offenders, mostly doing time for drug convictions. “When the role of drug offenders and nonviolent offenders is so pronounced, there is a sizable pool of offenders who could potentially be candidates for alternative sentencing options not now employed,” the report said.

This is more evidence that the war on drugs, which we will never win, as long as people want to do them, is something we ought to reconsider.  If the state is going to have to spend money here, I’d much prefer if it were to keep violent offenders off the street, rather than drug offenders.

The Drug War

This started out as a response to a comment by BadIdeaGuy, but I decided to turn it into a separate post. BadIdeaGuys pointed out:

There were more overdoses in Philly last year than gun homicides. Anyone seen an article on the drug problem facing Philly youth? My observation is that gun homicides occur largely in the “dealer class,” while the overdoses occur in the “user class”.

As much as I might recognize the drugs and violence are fairly intertwined, I think the drug war has hurt these communities more than the drugs themselves. I favor ending the drug war for this reason. Remove the black market incentive for drugs, and the violent black market in drugs will end.

You’ll still have the addict problem, but if you took all the money that goes into enforcing our drug laws (and it’s sizable), and put it into education and treatment, I think you’d find it money much better spent. It will help not having drug dealers shooting it out on the street corner, and it will also help not to send the message to young poor kids, with no hope and no opportunity, that the only way they can escape the poverty they live in is by joining a gang and selling drugs.

The drugs war, in my view, is a prime example of wealthy suburbanites supporting laws, under the illusion that it makes their kids safer from drugs, because they don’t live in the communities that are paying the price for maintaining that illusion. No doubt you’ll find support for keeping drugs illegal in virtually all communities, but the people I’ve encounterd who argue most passionately for it are middle class parents.

Reasons to Carry in the ‘Burbs

We need protection from the children of people involved in professional sports. Yep, Britt Reid is in trouble again, this time for raising a stir at a Plymouth Township shopping mall that I frequent semi-regularly, then crashing into a bunch of shopping carts when confronted by police. Police are checking to see if he was under the influence at the time.

Reid is out on bail awaiting sentencing for his previous crime, which involved threatening another motorist with a gun. No doubt this will not help his case when he goes before the judge.

Post Calls out “Jersey Justice”

The post sneers at Governor Corzine and Mayor Booker’s attempt to distract the attention away from the real problem with talks of stricter gun control.  I like what Dave Hardy had to say about this best:

This is one of those cases where you hope it’s all due to horrendous corruption. That’s the best case. Worst case is there was no corruption, this is how the NJ courts function in the ordinary case.

Hoping for horrendous corruption, because it’s the best case scenario.   That’s Garden State politics for ya, folks.

SacBee: Blame Congress

Even though federal law currently makes:

1. Straw purchases a felony
2. Unlawful to purchase a handgun outside of your state
3. Unlawful for felons to possess or purchase firearms at all
4. Requires firearms dealers to report multiple sales to the BATF
5. Requires dealers to run background checks on gun buyers

I could go on, but I don’t have room to list the many and numerous federal gun regulations that criminals ignore on a daily basis.   Yes, despite all this, the SacBee still thinks that Congress isn’t giving police the tools they need to fight crime.  They blame the Tiahrt Amendment, which does not restrict police for accessing trace data in criminal investigations, but they seem to imply that it does.  The facts are inconvenient when you’re trying to mislead the public to make your point.

Hat tip to Ace 

Evil “Assault Weapon” Taken Away by Victim

This group of criminals in Uniontown, Pennsylvania were certainly not prepared to have their victim fight back.   Despite brandishing an “assault weapon”, their victim managed to drop the magazine, and effectively disarm them, sending them fleeing.  They were captured by police.   Good show!

Folks who hate guns often tell us that criminals will just take the guns from us.  Well, that seems to happen quite often to them!