According to Dave Hardy, Napolitano has vetoed two gun bills. The first:
Gov. Janet Napolitano vetoed legislation Tuesday which would have allowed individuals to draw their weapons in cases where a reasonable person would believe it is necessary to protect against the use or attempted use of physical force.
I have to say, I agree with the governor on this one. Unless you’re justified in using deadly force, your gun should stay in its holster. For situations like the one described here:
“You wait ’til the big 6-foot-5, 280-pound guy knocks you on the ground and incapacitates you before you can tell him, ‘I’ve got a gun,’ ” he said.
“If that big guy threatens you, the next thing is he’s going to hit you,” Pearce explained, at which point “it’s too late to say anything.” He said Napolitano missed the whole point of the bill.
There’s already force disparity defenses to deal with that situation if you have to use deadly force on someone much larger than you, even if the offending party doesn’t have a weapon. Fists can be considered deadly weapons under some circumstances. One reason I think carrying OC [self-defense spray] is a good idea is because it’s useful for getting out of a physical altercation where deadly force wouldn’t be justified. While I agree with eliminating duties to retreat, allowing people to bring deadly force into a situation that has not yet escalating into that grave a situation seems like a bad idea.
The other bill Nepolitano vetoed was this:
Napolitano separately vetoed another measure Tuesday which would have made state-issued permits to carry a concealed weapon valid for the owner’s lifetime.
Little reason to veto this, since most state law enforcement agencies are monitoring criminal records of license holders and will revoke if you do something that makes you unqualified. The renewal is just a hoop to jump through so everyone can feel better.
UPDATE: It seems I may be misunderstanding Arizona law here. In Pennsylvania, we have no law against brandishing a firearm. If you pull a gun on someone, and don’t use it, you’re not liable if the bad guy beats a retreat or backs down, as long as the circumstances that caused you to draw was a deadly force situation. Folks are suggesting that’s not the case in Arizona. If Arizona law does punish for drawing, but not shooting, then that would seem to be something that should be fixed.
UPDATE: After looking at Arizona Revised Statutes on Justification, I’m not sure I was misunderstanding it. I have more information and questions here.