GOA Gets Burned Dabbling in Ancillary Issues

Apparently GOA held a position on “net neutrality” based on Larry Pratt’s paranoid delusions, and ended up aligning themselves with a left-wing who’s who. The writer of this article got a clarification from Pratt himself, saying they no longer support net neutrality now that it’s boiled down to Government control of the internets. Well, what else was it going to be? If private companies collude to limit bandwidth of certain services, or give priority to certain content, who else is going to come in to correct it? Jesus?

This is the danger of becoming involved in ancillary issues outside of your core mission. If GOA had held serious and convincing evidence that this was really a core gun rights issue, and aligned themselves with left wing groups who were also on the same side, I would have applauded them. But GOA’s entry into this issue was based on the vague idea that private businesses could or would conspire to limit access to Second Amendment information and communication. Could it happen? Maybe. But then the group they join asks Uncle Sam to step in, and suddenly it’s a horrible idea.

Again, I believe GOA to be a completely unserious organization when it comes to defending the Second Amendment, and this is just more evidence. They never should have involved themselves in this issue, and it seems pretty clear to me their involvement was poorly thought out. If you don’t trust private enterprise to control the Internet, and you don’t trust Uncle Sam to control the Internet, what is your preferred solution?

The Stupid Things Politicians Say

It’s always a good thing when politicians brag about their NRA grades, but this is pretty funny right here:

Long time Pro Gun, NRA Member and now Congressional Candidate, Don Browning receives the NRA “A” rating with the coveted ”Q” added. ( Emails messages are buzzing about the value of the NRA “A”,”Q” Ratings awarded to lifetime members of the NRA) Apparently Cliff Stearns was not awarded the valued “Q” because of incumbent status.

You see, the “Q” means the guy has no record, so his grade is based solely on his answer to the questionnaire. He’s spinning it as a special endorsement they give to lifetime NRA members. Politicians will do anything to get elected I guess. I’m sure Cliff Stearns is missing the “Q,” because he has a voting record.

Getting to Know Your NRA: Organization

It’s a common complaint to hear “I hate NRA, because one time they did X, and I just couldn’t stand it. They lost my support.” where X is any generic minor transgression you can think of. I’ve also heard people get upset for major transgressions, like losing world record filings, and for something like that I can understand. But much if it is trivial, which is why I found Miguel’s post so amusing. My suggestion to most people is that you can’t treat NRA as it if were a monolithic entity. Much like any workplace, there are people in it who are competent, people who are incompetent, people who are great people, and people who are bozos, or any combination of those traits. I feel that too often people who have encountered the dysfunction (and believe me, it’s there) fail to understand that dysfunction may be the result of encountering one dysfunctional employee, or perhaps a dysfunctional division. It doesn’t have to reflect the Association as a whole.

Wayne’s Office

Wayne is essentially the CEO of the NRA, and Wayne is either the big rock star of the issue, or the biggest snake to come along since the Garden of Eden, depending on who you talk to. For better or worse, what people love and hate about NRA gets attributed to him. But LaPierre is really no different than any other CEO, in that he is dependent on underlings to run the day-to-day operations of the organization. He is the highest executive staffer in the organization, and the public face of the National Rifle Association. Critics of the Association very often focus myopically on Wayne, as if he’s NRA’s biggest problem, but this misses the boat. I’m not even sure it’s the right port, to be honest.

NRA-ILA

ILA is the legislative arm of NRA, and it’s headed up by Chris Cox. The existence of ILA is in NRA’s bylaws. ILA is not as large as most people assume it to be. If it were its own organization, they would be considered a small company. ILA has about 80 people on staff, compared to about 500 NRA employees in total. Most people are surprised by that, because ILA has such a high profile in terms of NRA’s public mission, that many people assume it’s the largest division of NRA.

General Operations

Most of NRA’s traditional functions, in terms of competitions, shooting sports programs, law enforcement training and competition, the regular NRA training programs, and so on. The head of General Operations is Kayne Robinson. You’ve all doubt noticed NRA Blog, and its emphasis on shooting sports, competitions, etc. NRA Blog is run by the staff in General Operations, and their focus represents the mission of General Operations.

NRA Secretary’s Office

This is an office also stipulated in NRA’s bylaws. The Secretary’s office does a number of things, in addition to keeping the records for the Association. They are responsible for planning the Annual Meeting, which at this point is not a minor feet in event planning. This is one of the largest events in the country, it’s put on every year, and generally speaking, for as big as it is, goes pretty smoothly. The Secretary of the NRA is Major Ed Land, who’s military accomplishments you can read about here.

NRA Office of Advancement

These are the people who seek out donors for the NRA Foundations, and the numerous programs it supports. No, Advancement aren’t the person who sends you all the letters asking for money you used to heat your house last winter, Advancement seeks out bigger donors — people donating money into the thousands of dollar, and up to millions of dollar amounts. You can find out more about the type of work Advancement does at nragive.com. This is a relatively new office at NRA, created to help specifically help NRA seek out larger donors, and fully endow much of its non-political function. NRA has historically been dependent on small donations from its membership in order to fund all their programs. The problem with that is that donations fluctuate with the number of NRA member, with the economy, and the constant begging for money annoys membership. Most people I’ve spoken with understand that’s a problem, but NRA can’t fund itself on membership dollars alone.

NRA Board of Directors

The NRA Board is composed of 76 members. 75 of them are elected for a three year term on the general ballot which is send to voting members of the NRA (lifers, and people with 5 unbroken years of membership), with one elected to a one year term at each Annual Meeting also by voting members. In theory the NRA Board controls the overall direction of the Association. In practice it sometimes works that way, and sometimes doesn’t, for reasons I’ll get into later. Board positions are not paid positions. In fact, most Board members sacrifice a good deal to serve in their positions.

NRA Publications

These are the folks who produce your magazines, the flagships being American Rifleman, American Hunter, and America’s First Freedom, but in addition to that they have other worthy publications like Shooting Illustrated, and Shooting Sports USA, which members can subscribe to in addition to the publication that comes with their memberships. In addition to providing something that feeds their interests, NRA’s publications are also a critical means for the Association to communicate with its members, and also serves as the vessel for getting ballots out to people.

NRA Office of General Counsel

These are NRA’s lawyers. Every corporation of any reasonable size has counsel, but consider NRA’s lawyers have be well versed in a very broad area of law, and have a considerably more significant role to play within NRA than your ordinary corporate lawyers would in a conventional corporate structure. Office of General Counsel is headed up by Robert Dowlut. But they are not solely responsible for legal issues within NRA. NRA-ILA is actually charged with controlling NRA’s legal strategy, and then you have the Civil Rights Defense Fund, which is controlled by a Board Committee. But obviously Office of General Counsel plays a pretty significant role in all of these endeavors.

Top Ten Reasons for Not Supporting NRA Anymore

Thanks to Miguel for a good laugh over the weekend. Over this week I’m going to try to get in a series of posts about the NRA, how it works (or doesn’t work, as the case may be) so that folks can understand it better.

Gun and Garden Denying NRA Ads?

I have no patience for people who enjoy rights that they leave to others to defend and promote, and this would seem to be the demographic “Gun and Garden” magazine is aiming for. I have no issue with the magazine not accepting political ads, but NRA does more than just politics. When I contacted someone at NRA to inquire about the nature of the ad, I was told it was an “NRA Give” ad, which solicits funds for the Foundation. The NRA Foundation funds educational and shooting sport programs and not political activity. For a gun magazine, even a lifestyle magazine, this should not be controversial. There are more ways to contribute to this issue than just politics, and it’s appalling to me that Gun and Garden doesn’t seem to want to give the time to day to those efforts either.

Pro-Gun Democrats Looking for a Boost

Fox News (as has been documented on a gun blog somewhere, but I lost where I got this from, so I owe someone a hat tip) is noting that Democrats are hoping for a big NRA boost this year. If you want to know why even Chucky Shumer isn’t contesting the NRA exemption, this is why. The article notes that during 2002, NRA only spent 8% of its federal campaign contributions on Democrats. this year it’s 26%.

Gun Control Donations

Jacob notes that Gillibrand has received the most amount of gun control money. So far it looks like only McCarthy and Gillibrand have gotten serious money from the Brady PAC. I guess they want to ensure her conversion over to the dark side sticks. One of the great ironies of the 2008 elections is the Bradys dumped most of their PAC money into the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Considering the Senate Democrats have been remarkably pro-gun, I’m guessing they aren’t feeling too good about that expenditure right now.

But the real telling story is that the Brady PAC has only raised 2500 this cycle so far, and from a single donor. By contrast, NRA has raised $12,233,649 so far this cycle, from a quite large donor base. That’s almost 5000:1. Hell, even GOA’s very sad PAC has out-raised the Brady PAC by almost 28:1.

In the two big sources of political power, money and votes, the Bradys can no longer bring either of them to the table. And they wonder why Obama isn’t paying attention to them. No wonder Dennis Henigan is a sad panda.

Psy Ops

Looks like the Cal Guns guys were engaging in some psychological warfare against the Legal Community Against Gun Violence. The CalGuns guys are a very motivated and sharp group of people. I noticed this when Hardy linked to it the other day, and thought some of their ideas were pretty good, but some of them were kind of nuts. Now that it’s revealed it was just psychological warfare, good show guys!

Questions for Red State

So if NRA was so against the Coburn language that they tried to apparently sabotage it, who managed to convince Harry Reid to allow the vote on the Floor Amendment? I mean, if he did it out of the kindness of his heart, do you expect me to believe he’s anti gun as Red State suggests? Does GOA, who unfairly maligns Reid on guns because they are partisan, have sway in Reid’s office? Do the Democrats fear the withdrawal of the couple hundred bucks GOA donated to Dem candidates in 2008? GOA’s lobbying might? How’d the floor amendment happen? If Reid would have killed the DC Voting Rights Amendment, why did he allow the floor vote later? If he was against it, who was it who twisted his arm? If Reid was against it, why did he vote for the amendment?

What I’m saying is, what Red State is implying doesn’t make any sense. It doesn’t make any sense because I don’t think Red State knows much at all about this issue. I once again am confirmed in my belief that Red State has no credibility on Second Amendment issues, and is pissed off at NRA because they are supporting pro-gun Democrats.

This pisses me off, because if you weaken NRA, you weaken the Right to Bear Arms. There is no group that’s going to step up, or is capable of stepping up, and taking their place. That’s why I decided I had had enough of being nice, getting along, because we’re all on the same side after all, you know. GOA may give a good appearance of being with us, but they not on our side, and so I have set out to expose them for what they are; hacks who can only boost themselves at the expense of others, because they have no real accomplishments to speak of. That’s who Red State is aligning themselves with.

UPDATE: Kos seems to get it, it’s a shame that the Conservative movement doesn’t seem to. (h/t Uncle for that one)