Guns – Page 1096 – Shall Not Be Questioned

Dealing with Hippies

Countertop seems to have a great way to deal with anti-gun hippies.

UPDATE: My evil twin points out:

I think the term â€œhippieâ€ is used a bit too liberally; true hippies, of which there really arenâ€™t any younger than 65 or so, were way to mellow and stoned for strident confrontation. This was more Million Mom you-must-have-a-small-wiener NIMBY type harrassment than hippie-ish. But I think we all know the type weâ€™re dealing with here, in any event.

I think he’s right about this.Â Â To use an example, I once dated, before I met Bitter, a “college know-it-all” hippy 9 years my junior.Â She didn’t like my habit of collecting and shooting arms.Â Though, she’s hardly the type that would go up to someone and comment on something like that, she did express to me her disapproval of my hobby.

Her father, who is more of the aging stoner hippy, I don’t think really thinks too much of it.Â I think he’s more of the mellow accepting type.Â Somewhere along the lines things changed from the 60s style hippy, to the ones that South Park made fun of.

But possibly not.Â I think what probably happened was that the 60s hippies mellowed out as they became adults, and were probably just as annoying as young adults as the current generation is today.

Some Advocacy Tips

When engaging in advocacy in public, particularly in places where you’re not around other gun people, but are around the general public, it’s importnat to remember SayUncle’s wisdom, and stay away from the crazy stuff.Â Â From the Brady Blog, I noticed some people linked to this.

Now, you and I both know JPFO puts out stuff like this all the time, but if I showed this to any of my coworkers, they’d say “That’s totally nuts.Â It’s disgusting.” Â Most people aren’t going to get that a Jewish gun rights organization put a lot of that stuff out there. Â It’s going to get spun as “The gun nuts are using the holocaust to push their political agenda.” by the other side.

So think before you post stuff. Â Don’t think how your buddies at the gun club would take it. Â Think about how ordinary non-gun people you work with would take it.Â Our goal is to educate, not to shock people, and the imagery on that web page are shocking.Â I do think it’s important to point out that gun control enables genocide, but be careful how you go about it.Â It’s one thing to link to JPFO directly, but we have to be very careful about using their stuff outside of their context.

Brady Blog Funtime

I think we reached a new level of achievement when we turned the Brady Blog into a place where gun owners were talking shop about their favorite firearms and calibers. I was also amused to find out the gun blogosphere has two token blog parasites, according to Kelli. But do you wonder why the Brady Campaign has to gain from running a blog?

To understand that, you have to have some idea of how non-profits work. I’ve heard enough stories from Bitter’s career in non-profit (can’t mention which ones) to have some idea of why they might be allowing this. The reason is, the Brady Campaign have probably realized they need to break into the new media, and no doubt they’ve been hearing a lot of their donors say this as well. The pro-gun message is out there already, even though the NRA’s new media efforts, so far, have been pretty pitifully awful. But because the gun rights movement has real grass roots, we’ve self-organized and gotten the message out there in the new media, despite the fact that the NRA barely acknowledges we exist, let alone reaches out to us. But the Brady’s have to be out there in the new media, and we’re doing everything we can to help them!

“What?” you might ask, “we have pwned the Brady Blog!”

This might be true, but when it comes time to talk to their donors, do you really think they are going to say:

“Well, we started a blog, but it quickly became a forum for gun rights people to bash us, and then talk amongst themselves.”

No. It’s going to get spun like this:

“The Brady Campaign is definitely reaching out to New Media. Paul’s blog entries are cross posted at the Huffington Post, which is one of the leading progressive new media sites. Our own blog is getting thousands hits a day, and we’re getting hundreds of comments on each post that Paul does. Our new media efforts are getting our message out there, and people are responding.”

They won’t mention that most of the traffic and commentary is being driven by the gun blogosphere. This doesn’t mean I think we should just ignore the Brady Blog, because we need to have fun, after all; it can’t be all serious, all the time. But just keep in mind, they aren’t stupid, and one thing they are masterful at is spin. If they are letting us dominate their blog, there is probably a reason.

Uniform Firearms Act Oddities

I think some people are confused by Pennsylvania’s UFA in regards to how it defines firearms, and how you can carry an AR with an M4 upper loaded in a vehicle, but not a standard 16″ AR upper.Â Â That’s understandable, because it’s confusing for people who are familiar with Pennsylvania’s gun laws.Â Any time you look at PA law, you need to be sure which definition of firearm they are using.Â The standard definition of firearm under Pennsylvania law reads like this:

Any weapon which is designed to or may readily be converted to expel any projectile by the action of an explosive or the frame or receiver of any such weapon.

There are only a few places this is used, mostly for penalty enhancement to existing crimes, and prohibiting NFA firearms if the possessor has no complied with the NFA.

Most of Pennsylvania’s firearms laws are contained in the Uniform Firearms Act.Â In Pennsylvania, Firearms under the UFA are defined as:

Any pistol or revolver with a barrel length less than 15 inches, any shotgun with a barrel length less than 18 inches or any rifle with a barrel length less than 16 inches, or any pistol, revolver, rifle or shotgun with an overall length of less than 26 inches. The barrel length of a firearm shall be determined by measuring from the muzzle of the barrel to the face of the closed action, bolt or cylinder, whichever is applicable.

So basically, SBRs and SBSs, handguns, most AOWs, and machine pistols and most submachine guns, are considered firearms by the UFA, and are subject to it.Â That means the extra state police form to transfer one, no private transfers, and you need a license to have one in a vehicle (unless you fall under the exceptions, like going to the range, place of business, etc).Â If you have a license, you can carry a SBR, SBS, pistol, machine pistol, or submachine gun in a vehicle, loaded, because it’s a UFA firearm.

Long guns aren’t regulated for carry or transport by the state, except for not being allowed to have one loaded in a vehicle.Â That bit is mentioned in the UFA, and is meant to protect game codes that forbade the practice:

Â§ 6106.1. Carrying loaded weapons other than firearms.

(a) General rule.–Except as provided in Title 34 (relating to game), no person shall carry a loaded pistol, revolver, shotgun or rifle, other than a firearm as defined in section 6102 (relating to definitions), in any vehicle. The provisions of this section shall not apply to persons excepted from the requirement of a license to carry firearms under section 6106(b)(1), (2), (5) or (6) (relating to firearms not to be carried without a license) nor shall the provisions of this section be construed to permit persons to carry firearms in a vehicle where such conduct is prohibited by section 6106.(b) Penalty.–A person who violates the provisions of this section commits a summary offense.

So basically, you have a loaded rifle in your car, loaded meaning this:

A firearm is loaded if the firing chamber, the nondetachable magazine or, in the case of a revolver, any of the chambers of the cylinder contain ammunition capable of being fired. In the case of a firearm which utilizes a detachable magazine, the term shall mean a magazine suitable for use in said firearm which magazine contains such ammunition and has been inserted in the firearm or is in the same container or, where the container has multiple compartments, the same compartment thereof as the firearm.

I keep an assault weapon bag which has magazine pouches on the outside, and put loaded magazines in the pouches.Â I would argue that it’s a “separate compartment”, even though it would take 3 second to have a loaded rifle.Â If I’m wrong, I get a ticket, so who cares, plus, I only really do the truck gun thing when I’m traveling.

You can see that Pennsylvania law is rather odd here.Â Â If you had an M16, you can’t carry it loaded in a vehicle.Â If you have an M4, and a license to carry, load it up and stick it in the back seat, or stuff it in a trench coat, you’re good to go, and ready to rock and roll.Â SKS loaded in the back seat?Â No no.Â Loaded machine pistol under the seat?Â No problem! Â Weird huh?

History of Gun Control

If you haven’t seen it already:

History of Gun Control, Part 1

History of Gun Control, Part 2

History of Gun Control, Part 3

Sandy was a great voice for the NRA when she was President. Â I’m happy that she’s still on the NRA Board of Directors, and still getting the message out there.

NFA SBR Process

Looks like Uncle is going through it. I’ve been thinking about it myself. It really irks me that my AR carbine won’t accept a standard M7 bayonet. The reason is because the extra inch and a half on the barrel. One solution would be to put an M4 upper on it, but that makes it an SBR. I have a few questions if anyone can answer them.

If I put the old upper back on, does it cease to be NFA at that point? Or just being in the NFRTR makes it an SBR no matter what upper you put on it?
Are there issues moving SBRs between states? Do I have to fill out 5320.20 to move it interstate? Or does that only apply to machineguns?

Through curious definition in Pennsylvania law, I can’t carry a loaded rifle in a car. It’s only a summary offense to do so, but it’s a $300 fine. Loaded in this case means ammo not in a separate compartment from the rifle. However, if it’s an SBR, my carry license applies. I wouldn’t car carry a rifle with a round in the chamber, but a loaded magazine near the rifle or inserted into the mag well is considered loaded in PA law.

Take That, Brady Campaign!

The Tiahrt Amendment stays in place.Â Let the hewing and hawing from the anti-gun crowd begin.Â Seriously, with everything they put into getting that removed, they have to be feeling pretty browbeat right now.Â Gun control is a dying issue.Â Â We shouldn’t get complacent, but we have them on the run folks.

Gyrojet: Precursor to Guided Ammunition?

Tam reminded me of an old movie with Tom Selleck called Runaway.Â I didn’t think anyone else would remember this.Â Â Heat seeking bullets might not be too far fetched though.Â Â I mean, you won’t get bullets to turn corners and do aerial acrobatics, but minor corrections and some degree of guidance might be possible.Â Back during Vietnam, there was a type of gun introduced that, well, wasn’t even really a firearm.Â Â It’s actually a miniature rocket gun called the Gyrojet.Â Â It looks something like this:

These were tested in Vietnam, and although the projectiles hit harder than a .45 ACP at distance, they were ineffective at close ranges, and left a smoke trail back to the shooter.Â You can actually buy these, and there is still some ammunition left for it out there, though it’s outrageously expensive.Â If you want to see one up close, there are a few of them in the National Firearms Museum at NRA headquarters in Fairfax, Virginia.

If we used the same idea today, with modern technology, it might actually be possible to create a projectile for a weapon such as this with some form of guidance on it.Â I don’t know how practical it would be, but it sure would be pretty cool.Â We’re still a long ways off from deer cooking ballistics, though.

Armed America

I want to take a minute to point out a photo book called Armed America. Watch the video below. (Or follow this YouTube link)

I’ve been a long time member of the LiveJournal guns community, and I’ve been following this project since the beginning, and there are one or two of my LJ friends in the album. Kyle is a fantastic photographer, and I’d highly recommend getting the album.

Options for DC Residents

There are no gun shops within The District at all.Â So what options do DC residents have if Parker stands.Â According to Dave Hardy:

Back 20 years ago, I was told there was a sporting goods store in DC that had an FFL. I doubt you could get one today. A expensive solution might be to buy antique arms, those made before Jan. 1 1899, which are not “firearms” under the Gun Control Act and thus can be sold interstate. Rifles would be easiest to find (Krags, 1893 Mausers, etc.) but at greater expense you could probably get, oh, Colt Single Action Armies, etc..

I thought you could buy long guns out of state, as long as the laws of the resident and dealer’s states were complied with?Â I doubt you’ll find an FFL willing to do it, but I think in theory it could be done.

So here’s a question: Does DC’s ban get severed from the rest of their gun laws?Â Or do all of DC’s gun laws get removed? Â In other word, could I carry a loaded pistol within The District?