I’m hoping this means we can finally start having a serious discussion about violence in Philadelphia. It’s long overdue.
Hat Tip to Dave Hardy
The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State …
I’m hoping this means we can finally start having a serious discussion about violence in Philadelphia. It’s long overdue.
Hat Tip to Dave Hardy
He says that law evolves, but he also says:
“What we’re seeing on the streets of Philadelphia is not self-defense. It is sensless violence and slaughter.”
Nutter says it’s not lawful ownership but illegal activity that is the source of the gun violence in the city.
Really? Because my friend might have a different view on this one. Sorry Mayor, just because your lapdogs in the media aren’t reporting cases of self-defense against the criminals whom you have allowed to run amok, doesn’t mean they aren’t happening.
Pennsylvania’s gun laws are useless, because Philadelphia isn’t enforcing them, again. So why are they not only barking loudly for more, but if they aren’t going to enforce the laws we have now, why are they even on the books?
Philly has long been held hostage by trade unions. If Nutter manages to break them, he’ll be doing the City a tremedous service on the way to turning it around. Just to give you an idea how this city works:
A few days earlier, a couple of blocks away, the same electricians union had been outbid for a job repairing a bit of wiring at the Five Guys burger joint. The electricians are headed by John Dougherty, one of the city’s most vocal and visible union leaders, who has a reputation for rough tactics when it comes to union business. The union — Local 98 — sent picketers who insinuated that the restaurant was unclean due to a vermin infestation.
The unions in Philadelphia are no better than a criminal shakedown racket, and they are in desperate need of having their power smashed. If Nutter can accomplish that, it’ll make up for some of his bungling stupidity in other areas. This, no doubt, also has to do with Philadelphia voters kicking John Dougherty to the curb.
Having grown up in an area with a lot of union households, I can say based on my antecdotal evidence, this is more than just political correctness:
The “problematic†piece of legislation stemmed from a push by City Council for more racial balance in the trade unions, following a series of stunning revelations in previous weeks.
I had one of my friends who was in a trade union explain to me that “there’s no way we’d accept more n*****s into the apprenticeship when it’s getting harder for white people to find work.” Another said “if you hire scab labor, it’s just a bunch of lazy mexicans who will do faulty work.” When I used to work in a union shop part time in high school, it was our company’s unstated policy that no blacks would be hired, and I was looked at as if I had some kind of disease when I suggested this practice might be, I don’t know, morally and lawfully wrong. The common belief was “They’ll steal our product, and sell it to all to their ‘home boys.'”
Now, I’m not saying that all union members are racist, but in my experience growing up and working for a bit in that kind of environment, the attitude is pretty prevalent, and it’s difficult for me to believe that doesn’t make its way into decisions about who and who doesn’t get let into the apprenticeships.
It’s been almost two decades since I worked in a union shop, so maybe things have changed since then, but I think they’ve largely kept African Americans and other minorities out of the skilled trades, and the skilled trades are a way out of the poverty trap. As libertarians, we can’t go around demanding and end to government handouts and affermative action, and let remain in place the system, such as the one that exists in Philadelphia, that allow unions to hold the city hostage, and deny a fair shot to people outside that system to get ahead. It’s high time that was ended, and it’ll be an important component of any turnaround the city might have.
UPDATE: This is what used to happen when you stand up to union thugs in Philadelphia:
Altemose installed a mile-long chain-link fence around his work site, and proceeded without the unions. He started carrying a pistol, which he practiced shooting while wearing his coat and tie.
He and his workers received threats — such as acid in their kids’ faces — if the work continued. Altemose installed a device on his car so he could start it by remote control each morning in his driveway.
In June, a thousand union men showed up in Valley Forge, wearing hard hats. They trampled over the chain-link fence and began what the state Supreme Court later called “a virtual military assault,†using color-coded smoke bombs to designate targeted areas, along with firebombs and — incredibly — hand grenades.
The second amendment protects us against a lot more than just government thugs. Would Altmouse have had the minerals to stand up to the unions if he was forcibly disarmed by a government that would have most decidedly looked the other way when it came to union thugs carrying guns?
Looking over this very interesting post on ATF enforcement patterns at SayUncle, it would seem the City of Philadelphia refers a great number of cases over to federal prosecutors for violations of federal gun laws. The feds took only 238 of the 1578 cases that were referred to them. The top reason for our district was “Minimal federal interest, or no deterrent value.”
So if the feds aren’t using the laws to go after actual violent criminals, but are using the law to go after people like Wayne Fincher, David Olafson, and various other folks who are no threat to polite society, what use are they really in terms of public safety? What is the “federal interest” in sending hobbyists to federal prison, but not violent felons?
I would note that until the Attorney General Corbett came in, Philadelphia almost never went after cases like this. I guess they got tired of us telling them they weren’t using the existing laws. Of course, if they are serious about continuing it, how much you want to bet it lowers the murder rate in Philadelphia?
In the Trentonian yesterday: “Jersey gun problem PA’s fault”:
New Jersey’s biggest obstacle to controlling gun-related crimes could be the state of Pennsylvania, according to federal data analyzed by the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.
The vast majority of gun crimes committed in Jersey involve guns that were sold from another state, and most of those recovered firearms came from the Keystone State in 2007.
This data, compiled by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives, show that only 27.9 percent of crime guns recovered last year in New Jersey came from Garden State dealers. Of the 1,467 out-of-state crime guns seized by law-enforcement agencies in Jersey last year, most of them (285) originated from Pennsy gun dealers.
Of course, what they don’t mention is that most gun shops in New Jersey have closed down due to the opporessive gun regulations in that state. The shooting and hunting culture in that state has all but been completely extinguished by regulations that can land you seven years in prison by stopping at a Dunkin Donuts drivethrough on the way back from the range for a cup of coffee.
They don’t have to make guns illegal if they just make owning them so legally risky that no one bothers, except the criminals.  Now they want to do the same thing to Pennsylvania; to destroy its hunting and shooting culture, and close down thousands of gun shops in the state.  No thanks.  The end result will still be criminals getting guns, they will just smuggle them from somewhere else.
People like Bryan Miller won’t stop until they destroy the second amendment. They might not destroy it outright, but they can destroy it through attrition. It happened in New Jersey, and we can’t let it happen here.
First they pass gun laws which are illegal, now the Sheriff of Philadelphia has apparently refused to do one of his key functions, which is to foreclose on houses:
With the economy soft and thousands of Philadelphians delinquent on their mortgages, Sheriff Green this spring refused to hold a court-ordered foreclosure auction. His move raised eyebrows on the bench and dropped jaws among lenders and their attorneys, who accuse him of shirking his duty to enforce legal contracts.
When I was shopping for a house, at the height of the sub-prime business, I avoided it because it looked like a stupendously bad idea. Why not lock in a low interest rate for 30 years? If you didn’t think carefully, or read the fine print, why should you be able to evade responsibility for your mistake?
And before you say I don’t have a heart, and don’t care about poor people, how do you think those poor people are going to fare when no one will lend them money for mortgages, or other loans, because banks decide that making loans in Philadelphia is too risky because the law doesn’t apply there?
The city gets two gun laws outright thrown out before anyone has even tried to enforce them, and the other three are dismissed on standing, which is not the same as the laws being upheld, the city has gone and declared victory. Now the AP seems to have gotten it right, but the city media? Hook, line and sinker baby. Joe Grace, I have to hand it to you. You’re a brash and brazen scheister, but you’re good. Anyone who can do media relations for a guy as corrupt and crooked as John Street has to be.
The Philadelphia Metro should be ahsamed of itself, though. When you’re just a propaganda arm of City Government, what good are you as journalists? Are you doing any service to the citizens of Philadelphia?
I have a copy of the audio segment where the mayor answers my question. The question wasn’t submitted under my alias, so don’t listen for Sebastian :) It starts right off with the gun issue.