Joe Huffman helped set a reporter straight on Obama’s record.
Category: The Media
Media Bias Has Disappeared
Because it’s no longer bias. As Glenn Reynolds pointed out yesterday, the media is in the tank for Obama:
I promised some thoughts on what to do about the news media’s outright campaigning for Obama. (And that’s what it is. Media bias used to mean that they would slow-walk stories that reflected badly on their candidate; now they just flat out ignore them, or even try to shoot them down. They’re not just in the tank, they’re functioning as arms of the campaign, and Obama’s strategy shows that he knows that and is relying on it.)
Just this morning I had to turn off the radio, because the local propaganda mouthpiece of the Obama Campaign ran coverage which started out with an Alaskan commenting that she is not to be underestimated, and then following up with the various ways people think she’s not qualified, including polls showing that only 25% of voters think she’s qualified. Even though she’s, you know, about as qualified as Obama is. Prof. Reynolds talks about solutions:
There’s a vast underserved population out there, for news, entertainment, movies, etc., and if people start serving it, the current “mainstream” media won’t be so mainstream anymore. So if you’re unhappy with current offerings, put your money where your mouth is.
And if you’re one of the people with creative interests, start making alternative stuff. Not just news and punditry, but entertainment, documentaries, etc. If An American Carol does well this weekend, it’ll make it a lot easier for the next film of its type to be made. If Evan Coyne Maloney’s documentary work does well, it’ll encourage a lot more of that kind of work.
Think of it like cultivating a garden: Starve the weeds, feed the flowers. Like gardening, it’s work. But like gardening, if you do the work you’ll see results.
I agree. Make sure you get out to see An American Carol this weekend. Even though we’re booked solid this weekend with election volunteer stuff, Bitter and I are going to make time. We need it to do well. That sends a powerful signal to the market.
This morning Glenn linked to a piece showing that the Boston Globe is still spreading lies about Sarah Palin that have been repeatedly debunked. This is the worst I’ve ever seen a media. We honestly don’t have a functioning Republic as long as these people continue to peddle their shameless propaganda as legitimate journalism. Perhaps this will be the election where the voting public realizes the emperor has no clothes. I certainly hope so.
Thoughts on Media Bias
Dave Hardy talks about how newspapers used to report the news.
Yup, reporters were more respected then. I recall reading of the Civil War … at one point Grant needs to get a message to President Lincoln, so he just sends it with a reporter who is going to DC. He adds a verbal message. The reporter only reveals that years after the event; Grant told him that it was for Lincoln alone. After Shiloh, I think, Grant for the only time gets blind drunk and passes out. A reporter (with whom he was riding) throws his coat over him to hide his stars if anyone rides by, and only reveals the event long after the war is over. A reporter is within earshot of Grant giving orders to his commanders, and is chastised — you’re not supposed to listen in at this level! Nobody thought anything unusual of a reporter traveling with army headquarters, it’s just that there’s an unwritten rule you won’t actually listen in to Grant and Meade giving orders for the day. No need for interviews: you’re there when everything is happening, out riding and drinking with them, etc.
Read the whole thing. I suspect a lot of the trust afforded the military of journalists had to do with the fact that information was just much harder to disperse back then. It’s much much harder to control information these days. That probably tends to create less trust than you could instill in people when information was much more difficult to spread around.
I also think part of the problem isn’t so much bias, but people’s perception of the media as providing accurate and unbiased information. Blogs are certainly biased, but we don’t claim to be anything other than biased. I think journalism would be better off if papers were just up front with the biases in their reporting, and everyone knew about them.
FactCheck.org’s Bad Facts Go Mainstream
National Review has more to say about FactCheck.org lack of facts. Apparently the Washington Post is joining in the deception as well. You can’t really blame them, they do have an election to win, after all.
UPDATE: CNN Joins in with the same nonsense.
UPDATE: The Washington Independent too.
UPDATE: Firearms and freedom sums it up:
I can sum up factcheck.org’s “check†of the NRA material in 5 words: “Obama says that’s not true!â€
Like I said, they have an election to win.
The WaPo Has Some Gall
The Washington Post are taking Mark Warner to task for getting behind the bill to force DC to comply with Heller:
It was jarring, however, to see Mr. Warner take a position at odds with his well-groomed image of a moderate. As he knows, D.C. officials already are working to bring the city in compliance with the ruling of the high court, and Mr. Warner would never countenance for Virginia a law as extreme as that proposed for the District.
What? Do Journalists even bother to do research anymore? Virginia’s gun laws are in numerous ways more liberal than those proposed for the District of Colombia by Congress. In fact, that is the case in most states. Here’s what you can do in Virginia you can’t do in DC, even if the proposed Heller enforcement bill becomes law:
- Get a license to carry a loaded firearm concealed.
- Carry concealed on a reciprocal license if you’re from another state.
- Carry any firearm loaded, openly, without a license.
- Buy a machine gun, suppressor, or short barreled rifle or shotgun.
- Own pistol ammunition that you don’t own a pistol for.
Mark Warner doesn’t have to countenance a law as “extreme” as the District’s for Virginia. Virginia law is already better than the proposed law for D.C.! And I won’t even get into the fact that Arlington and Fairfax Counties have crime rates that are a fraction of those found on the other side of the Potomac.
How Dare She Challenge the Lightworker!
Mark Morford, who introduced us to Obama the Lightworker, has a new piece out on Sarah Palin:
It’s more accurate to say that every thoughtful or liberal or intuitive or open-minded white woman I know worth her vagina monologue and her self-determination and two centuries of nonstop striving for equal rights and sexual freedom and exhaustive patriarchal unshackling is right now openly horrified, appalled at what the addition of shrill PTA hockey-mom Sarah Palin seems to have done for the soggy, comatose McCain campaign — that is, make it not merely remotely interesting and melodramatic, but aggressively hostile to, well, to all intelligent women everywhere.
It is absolutely amazing anyone, including a major newspaper, takes this guy seriously. Hat tip to Volokh.
Philly Inquirer Shows Itself a Rag
Caleb points out this piece of garbage article in the Philadelphia Inquirer:
It has been years since groups such as the Montana Militia, the Posse Comitatus and the Sagebrush Rebels, and individuals such as Terry Nichols and Ted Kaczynski have made us wonder why so many “angry white men” populated our rural regions.
Maybe it’s because ignorant and prejudiced academic pricks like Catherine McNicol keep consencending and thumbing their nose at rural white men. I know this sounds crazy, but that tends to make people angry. I’ve run into just as much intolerance and racism in urban areas as I have in rural areas, and to be honest, some of the most ignorant and provincial people I know don’t occupy America’s heartland, but our coastal urban centers. Tolerance has to be a two way street, and it’s a shame that obviously well educated academics like McNicol don’t understand that.
It’s even more disturbing that the Philadelphia Inquirer, a newspaper that serves a city that should understand being looked down at and spit on, would print such utter bigotry.
Hook, Line and Sinker
You know, we in the gun blogosphere tend to snicker at the Brady’s over the top fear mongering. I have to admit, it would be a lot more funny if there weren’t a lot of folks in the media buying it. Look at this article from Homeland Security Today:
Even more seriously from the standpoint of homeland security according to the report, H.R. 6691, the report claims, would even allow open carrying of .50 caliber sniper rifles, capable of destroying armored personnel carriers, aircraft and bulk fuel and ammunition sites. These guns can penetrate several inches of steel, a three and a half inch storm sewer cover, or a 600-pound safe. They are accurate at up to 2,000 yards, and can inflict effective damage to targets over four miles away.
Except the Marine Corps demonstration video that showed a .50BMG shooting through a safe, and several inches of steel, was with a special high explosive armor piercing round that’s only available to the military, and rounds that aren’t .50 can penetrate a half inch of mild steel (which is what manhole covers are made from). Reporters don’t know this, so they are fooled. The Brady’s may have gone way over the top with this, but most of the media is too ignorant to question it. It may be dishonest, but it works.
Media Bias?
ABC News edited key parts of Charlie Gibson’s interview with Sarah Palin. Now, I’m not a professional journalist, but I would think if you need to edit a segment for length, you cut out questions, along with the answers. It appears to me that all the answers that reflected the depth of her understanding of issues ended up on the cutting room floor.
But hey, ABC News has an election to win. All is fair in politics right?
Positive Coverage of Clubs in the News
One in Texas, which might be perhaps the oldest shooting club in the United States, and one in update New York. Both are smallbore/airgun clubs, but hey, you can have a good time with both. The Texas Club, New Braunfels Schuetzen Verein, has been in existence since 1849. If they are indeed the oldest club, it’s interesting to ponder what effect immigration played in the 19th century in transforming the shooting culture, particularly in bringing European style shooting clubs to the United States.
It will be interesting to see the effect heavy Russian immigration has on the shooting culture here in the Philadelphia area, which has developed a very significant community of Russian and Eastern European shooters, both men and women. I haven’t noticed them too much in the area club culture, but at the public ranges, Russian is a common language on the range in this area.